Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Zidovudine after occupational exposure to the human immunodeficiency virus

  • Frank S. Rhame
  • , Ann L. Russell
  • , Jacquelyn A. Polder
  • , David M. Bell
  • , William J. Martone
  • , Linda S. Martin
  • , James W. Curran
  • , Paul Beninger
  • , David K. Henderson

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

Abstract

To the Editor: We write to challenge the Public Health Service's recent recommendation that a physician obtain written consent from a health care worker before prescribing zidovudine as prophylaxis after occupational exposure to HIV.1 This new mandate constitutes a subtle attack on a physician's prescribing prerogatives and risks subverting the informed-consent process to a pro forma legal requirement. Presumably, the basis of the recommendation for written consent is that the label approved by the Food and Drug Administration for zidovudine does not include postexposure prophylaxis among the indications for use. However, the FDA has no mandate to approve each specific.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)266-267
Number of pages2
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume324
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 24 1991

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Zidovudine after occupational exposure to the human immunodeficiency virus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this