TY - JOUR
T1 - Youth access to artificial UV radiation exposure
T2 - Practices of 3647 US indoor tanning facilities
AU - Pichon, Latrice C.
AU - Mayer, Joni A.
AU - Hoerster, Katherine D.
AU - Woodruff, Susan I.
AU - Slymen, Donald J.
AU - Belch, George E.
AU - Clapp, Elizabeth J.
AU - Hurd, Ami L.
AU - Forster, Jean L.
AU - Weinstock, Martin A.
PY - 2009/9
Y1 - 2009/9
N2 - Objective: To assess indoor tanning facility practices in a sample of facilities in 116 cities representing all 50 states. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: United States. Participants: Employees of 3647 indoor tanning facilities were contacted by telephone. Data collectors (ie, confederates) posed as prospective, fair-skinned, 15-year-old female customers who had never tanned before. Main Outcome Measures: Confederates asked respondents about their facility's practices related to parental consent, parental accompaniment, and allowable tanning session frequency. Results: Approximately 87% of the facilities required parental consent, 14% required parental accompaniment, 5% said they would not allow the confederate to tan owing to her age, and 71% would allow tanning every day the first week of indoor tanning. In Wisconsin, which bans indoor tanning among those younger than 16 years, 70% of facilities would not allow the confederate to tan. Multivariate analyses indicated that facilities in states with a youth access law were significantly more likely to require parental consent (P<.001) and parental accompaniment (P<.001) than those in states without a youth access law. Law was not significantly related to allowable tanning frequency (P=.81). Conclusion: We recommend that additional states pass youth access legislation, preferably in the form of bans.
AB - Objective: To assess indoor tanning facility practices in a sample of facilities in 116 cities representing all 50 states. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: United States. Participants: Employees of 3647 indoor tanning facilities were contacted by telephone. Data collectors (ie, confederates) posed as prospective, fair-skinned, 15-year-old female customers who had never tanned before. Main Outcome Measures: Confederates asked respondents about their facility's practices related to parental consent, parental accompaniment, and allowable tanning session frequency. Results: Approximately 87% of the facilities required parental consent, 14% required parental accompaniment, 5% said they would not allow the confederate to tan owing to her age, and 71% would allow tanning every day the first week of indoor tanning. In Wisconsin, which bans indoor tanning among those younger than 16 years, 70% of facilities would not allow the confederate to tan. Multivariate analyses indicated that facilities in states with a youth access law were significantly more likely to require parental consent (P<.001) and parental accompaniment (P<.001) than those in states without a youth access law. Law was not significantly related to allowable tanning frequency (P=.81). Conclusion: We recommend that additional states pass youth access legislation, preferably in the form of bans.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349306864&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349306864&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.85
DO - 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.85
M3 - Article
C2 - 19770438
AN - SCOPUS:70349306864
SN - 0003-987X
VL - 145
SP - 997
EP - 1002
JO - Archives of Dermatology
JF - Archives of Dermatology
IS - 9
ER -