TY - JOUR
T1 - Youth access laws
T2 - In the dark at the tanning parlor?
AU - Dellavalle, Robert P.
AU - Parker, Eva R.
AU - Cersonsky, Nancy
AU - Hester, Eric J.
AU - Hemme, Bragg
AU - Burkhardt, Diane L.
AU - Chen, Alan K.
AU - Schilling, Lisa M.
PY - 2003/4/1
Y1 - 2003/4/1
N2 - Objective: To compare laws governing youth access to UV irradiation at indoor tanning facilities with laws governing youth access to tobacco. Design: Tobacco and UV irradiation youth access laws were assessed via correspondence with public health offices and computerized legal searches of 6 industrialized nations with widely differing skin cancer incidence rates. Setting: National, provincial, and state legal systems in Australia, Canada, France, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Participants: Public health, legal, information science, and medical professionals and government and tanning industry representatives. Main Outcome Measures: Statutes specifying age restrictions for the purchase of indoor tanning services or tobacco products. Results: The 5 English-speaking countries with common law-based legal systems unilaterally prohibit youth access to tobacco but rarely limit youth access to UV irradiation from tanning salons. Only very limited regions in the United States and Canada prohibit youth access to indoor tanning facilities: Texas, Illinois, Wisconsin, and New Brunswick prohibit tanning salon use by minors younger than 13, 14, 16, and 18 years, respectively. In contrast, French law allows minors to purchase tobacco but prohibits those younger than 18 years from patronizing tanning salons. Conclusions: Youth access laws governing indoor tanning display remarkable variety. Uniform indoor tanning youth access laws modeled on the example of tobacco youth access laws merit consideration.
AB - Objective: To compare laws governing youth access to UV irradiation at indoor tanning facilities with laws governing youth access to tobacco. Design: Tobacco and UV irradiation youth access laws were assessed via correspondence with public health offices and computerized legal searches of 6 industrialized nations with widely differing skin cancer incidence rates. Setting: National, provincial, and state legal systems in Australia, Canada, France, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Participants: Public health, legal, information science, and medical professionals and government and tanning industry representatives. Main Outcome Measures: Statutes specifying age restrictions for the purchase of indoor tanning services or tobacco products. Results: The 5 English-speaking countries with common law-based legal systems unilaterally prohibit youth access to tobacco but rarely limit youth access to UV irradiation from tanning salons. Only very limited regions in the United States and Canada prohibit youth access to indoor tanning facilities: Texas, Illinois, Wisconsin, and New Brunswick prohibit tanning salon use by minors younger than 13, 14, 16, and 18 years, respectively. In contrast, French law allows minors to purchase tobacco but prohibits those younger than 18 years from patronizing tanning salons. Conclusions: Youth access laws governing indoor tanning display remarkable variety. Uniform indoor tanning youth access laws modeled on the example of tobacco youth access laws merit consideration.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037386829&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037386829&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/archderm.139.4.443
DO - 10.1001/archderm.139.4.443
M3 - Article
C2 - 12707090
AN - SCOPUS:0037386829
SN - 0003-987X
VL - 139
SP - 443
EP - 448
JO - Archives of Dermatology
JF - Archives of Dermatology
IS - 4
ER -
