Young adults' responses to alternative messages describing a sugar-sweetened beverage price increase

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Many jurisdictions in the USA and globally are considering raising the prices of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) through taxes as a strategy to reduce their consumption. The objective of the present study was to identify whether the rationale provided for an SSB price increase affects young adults' behavioural intentions and attitudes towards SSB. Design: Participants were randomly assigned to receive one of eight SSB price increase rationales. Intentions to purchase SSB and attitudes about the product and policy were measured. Setting: A forty-six-item cross-sectional Internet survey. Subjects: Undergraduate students (n 494) at a large US Midwestern university. Results: Rationale type was significantly associated with differences in participants' purchasing intentions for the full sample (F 7,485=2·53, P=0·014). Presenting the rationale for an SSB price increase as a user fee, an effort to reduce obesity, a strategy to offset health-care costs or to protect children led to lower SSB purchasing intentions compared with a message with no rationale. Rationale type was also significantly associated with differences in perceptions of soda companies (F 7,485=2·10, P=0·043); among low consumers of SSB, messages describing the price increase as a user fee or tax led to more negative perceptions of soda companies. Conclusions: The rationale attached to an SSB price increase could influence consumers. However, these message effects may depend on individuals' level of SSB consumption.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)46-52
Number of pages7
JournalPublic health nutrition
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Beverages
Young Adult
Fees and Charges
Taxes
Health Care Costs
Internet
Obesity
Cross-Sectional Studies
Students

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Policy
  • Sugar-sweetened beverage
  • Tax

Cite this

@article{afc81c005b584e65b29be2509323d7ec,
title = "Young adults' responses to alternative messages describing a sugar-sweetened beverage price increase",
abstract = "Objective: Many jurisdictions in the USA and globally are considering raising the prices of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) through taxes as a strategy to reduce their consumption. The objective of the present study was to identify whether the rationale provided for an SSB price increase affects young adults' behavioural intentions and attitudes towards SSB. Design: Participants were randomly assigned to receive one of eight SSB price increase rationales. Intentions to purchase SSB and attitudes about the product and policy were measured. Setting: A forty-six-item cross-sectional Internet survey. Subjects: Undergraduate students (n 494) at a large US Midwestern university. Results: Rationale type was significantly associated with differences in participants' purchasing intentions for the full sample (F 7,485=2·53, P=0·014). Presenting the rationale for an SSB price increase as a user fee, an effort to reduce obesity, a strategy to offset health-care costs or to protect children led to lower SSB purchasing intentions compared with a message with no rationale. Rationale type was also significantly associated with differences in perceptions of soda companies (F 7,485=2·10, P=0·043); among low consumers of SSB, messages describing the price increase as a user fee or tax led to more negative perceptions of soda companies. Conclusions: The rationale attached to an SSB price increase could influence consumers. However, these message effects may depend on individuals' level of SSB consumption.",
keywords = "Communication, Policy, Sugar-sweetened beverage, Tax",
author = "Gollust, {Sarah E.} and Xuyang Tang and White, {James M.} and French, {Simone A.} and Runge, {Carlisle Ford} and Rothman, {Alexander J.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1368980016001816",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "46--52",
journal = "Public Health Nutrition",
issn = "1368-9800",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Young adults' responses to alternative messages describing a sugar-sweetened beverage price increase

AU - Gollust, Sarah E.

AU - Tang, Xuyang

AU - White, James M.

AU - French, Simone A.

AU - Runge, Carlisle Ford

AU - Rothman, Alexander J.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Objective: Many jurisdictions in the USA and globally are considering raising the prices of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) through taxes as a strategy to reduce their consumption. The objective of the present study was to identify whether the rationale provided for an SSB price increase affects young adults' behavioural intentions and attitudes towards SSB. Design: Participants were randomly assigned to receive one of eight SSB price increase rationales. Intentions to purchase SSB and attitudes about the product and policy were measured. Setting: A forty-six-item cross-sectional Internet survey. Subjects: Undergraduate students (n 494) at a large US Midwestern university. Results: Rationale type was significantly associated with differences in participants' purchasing intentions for the full sample (F 7,485=2·53, P=0·014). Presenting the rationale for an SSB price increase as a user fee, an effort to reduce obesity, a strategy to offset health-care costs or to protect children led to lower SSB purchasing intentions compared with a message with no rationale. Rationale type was also significantly associated with differences in perceptions of soda companies (F 7,485=2·10, P=0·043); among low consumers of SSB, messages describing the price increase as a user fee or tax led to more negative perceptions of soda companies. Conclusions: The rationale attached to an SSB price increase could influence consumers. However, these message effects may depend on individuals' level of SSB consumption.

AB - Objective: Many jurisdictions in the USA and globally are considering raising the prices of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) through taxes as a strategy to reduce their consumption. The objective of the present study was to identify whether the rationale provided for an SSB price increase affects young adults' behavioural intentions and attitudes towards SSB. Design: Participants were randomly assigned to receive one of eight SSB price increase rationales. Intentions to purchase SSB and attitudes about the product and policy were measured. Setting: A forty-six-item cross-sectional Internet survey. Subjects: Undergraduate students (n 494) at a large US Midwestern university. Results: Rationale type was significantly associated with differences in participants' purchasing intentions for the full sample (F 7,485=2·53, P=0·014). Presenting the rationale for an SSB price increase as a user fee, an effort to reduce obesity, a strategy to offset health-care costs or to protect children led to lower SSB purchasing intentions compared with a message with no rationale. Rationale type was also significantly associated with differences in perceptions of soda companies (F 7,485=2·10, P=0·043); among low consumers of SSB, messages describing the price increase as a user fee or tax led to more negative perceptions of soda companies. Conclusions: The rationale attached to an SSB price increase could influence consumers. However, these message effects may depend on individuals' level of SSB consumption.

KW - Communication

KW - Policy

KW - Sugar-sweetened beverage

KW - Tax

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84980349713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84980349713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1368980016001816

DO - 10.1017/S1368980016001816

M3 - Article

C2 - 27465661

AN - SCOPUS:84980349713

VL - 20

SP - 46

EP - 52

JO - Public Health Nutrition

JF - Public Health Nutrition

SN - 1368-9800

IS - 1

ER -