Abstract
This paper summarizes the social science research on the record of housing dispersal programs since 1995. The research shows a consistently disappointing record of benefits to low-income households. Households moved out of high-poverty neighborhoods, voluntarily and involuntarily, show few or no beneficial effects in terms of economic self-sufficiency, health benefits, or social integration. The benefits of dispersal are confined to feelings of greater safety and satisfaction with neighborhood environmental conditions. We offer a framework for understanding the disappointing record of dispersal, highlighting its translation from social science diagnosis to policy, problems in the policy's implementation, its underlying theory of poverty, and the political context within which dispersal has been applied.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 209-236 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | Housing Policy Debate |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2010 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- Dispersal
- Housing
- Mobility
- Relocation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'You gotta move: Advancing the debate on the record of dispersal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS