X-Ray bright active galactic nuclei in massive galaxy clusters - II. The fraction of galaxies hosting active nuclei

  • S. Ehlert
  • , A. von der Linden
  • , S. W. Allen
  • , W. N. Brandt
  • , Y. Q. Xue
  • , B. Luo
  • , A. Mantz
  • , R. G. Morris
  • , D. Applegate
  • , P. Kelly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

49 Scopus citations

Abstract

We present a measurement of the fraction of cluster galaxies hosting X-ray bright active galactic nuclei (AGN) as a function of clustercentric distance scaled in units of r500. Our analysis employs high-quality Chandra X-ray and Subaru optical imaging for 42 massive X-ray-selected galaxy cluster fields spanning the redshift range 0.2 < z < 0.7. In total, our study involves 176 AGN with bright (R < 23) optical counterparts above a 0.5-8.0 keV flux limit of 10-14 erg cm-2 s-1. When excluding central dominant galaxies from the calculation, we measure a cluster galaxy AGN fraction in the central regions of the clusters that is~3 times lower than the field value. This fraction increases with clustercentric distance before becoming consistent with the field at ~2.5r500. Our data exhibit similar radial trends to those observed for star formation and optically selected AGN in cluster member galaxies, both of which are also suppressed near cluster centres to a comparable extent. These results strongly support the idea that X-ray AGN activity and strong star formation are linked through their common dependence on available reservoirs of cold gas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1942-1949
Number of pages8
JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume437
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2013

Keywords

  • Galaxies: Active
  • Galaxies: Clusters: General
  • Galaxies: Photometry
  • X-rays: Galaxies
  • Xrays: Galaxies: Clusters

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'X-Ray bright active galactic nuclei in massive galaxy clusters - II. The fraction of galaxies hosting active nuclei'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this