Writing flexibility in argumentative essays: a multidimensional analysis

Laura K. Allen, Aaron D. Likens, Danielle S. McNamara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations


The assessment of argumentative writing generally includes analyses of the specific linguistic and rhetorical features contained in the individual essays produced by students. However, researchers have recently proposed that an individual’s ability to flexibly adapt the linguistic properties of their writing may more accurately capture their proficiency. However, the features of the task, learner, and educational context that influence this flexibility remain largely unknown. The current study extends this research by examining relations between linguistic flexibility, reading comprehension ability, and feedback in the context of an automated writing evaluation system. Students (n = 131) wrote and revised six argumentative essays in an automated writing evaluation system and were provided both summative and formative feedback on their writing. Additionally, half of the students had access to a spelling and grammar checker that provided lower-level feedback during the writing period. The results provide evidence for the supposition that skilled writers demonstrate linguistic flexibility across the argumentative essays that they produce. However, analyses also indicate that lower-level feedback (i.e., spelling and grammar feedback) have little to no impact on the properties of students’ essays nor on their variability across prompts or drafts. Overall, the current study provides important insights into the role of flexibility in argumentative writing skill and develops a strong foundation on which to conduct future research and educational interventions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1607-1634
Number of pages28
JournalReading and Writing
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 15 2019
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Acknowledgements This research was supported in part by IES Grants R305A120707 and R305A180261 as well as the Office of Naval Research (Grant No. N00014-16-1-2611). Opinions, conclusions, or recommendations do not necessarily reflect the view of the Department of Education, IES, or the Office of Naval Research.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer Nature B.V.


  • Dynamics
  • Feedback
  • Flexibility
  • Individual differences
  • Intelligent tutoring systems
  • Linguistics
  • Natural language processing
  • Writing


Dive into the research topics of 'Writing flexibility in argumentative essays: a multidimensional analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this