Worklife and Wellness in Academic General Internal Medicine: Results from a National Survey

Mark Linzer, Sara Poplau, Stewart Babbott, Tracie Collins, Laura Guzman-Corrales, Jeremiah Menk, Mary Lou Murphy, Kay Ovington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

84 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: General internal medicine (GIM) careers are increasingly viewed as challenging and unsustainable. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess academic GIM worklife and determine remediable predictors of stress and burnout. DESIGN: We conducted an email survey. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants in 15 GIM divisions participated. MAIN MEASURES: A ten-item survey queried stress, burnout, and work conditions such as electronic medical record (EMR) challenges. An open-ended question assessed stressors and solutions. Results were categorized into burnout, high stress, high control, chaos, good teamwork, high values alignment, documentation time pressure, and excessive home EMR use. Frequencies were determined for national data, Veterans Affairs (VA) versus civilian populations, and hospitalist versus ambulatory roles. A General Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) evaluated associations with burnout. A formal content analysis was performed for open-ended question responses. KEY RESULTS: Of 1235 clinicians sampled, 579 responded (47 %). High stress was present in 67 %, with 38 % burned out (burnout range 10–56 % by division). Half of respondents had low work control, 60 % reported high documentation time pressure, half described too much home EMR time, and most reported very busy or chaotic workplaces. Two-thirds felt aligned with departmental leaders’ values, and three-quarters were satisfied with teamwork. Burnout was associated with high stress, low work control, and low values alignment with leaders (all p < 0.001). The 45 VA faculty had less burnout than civilian counterparts (17 % vs. 40 %, p < 0.05). Hospitalists described better teamwork than ambulatory clinicians and fewer hospitalists noted documentation time pressure (both p < 0.001). Key themes from the qualitative analysis were short visits, insufficient support staff, a Relative Value Unit mentality, documentation time pressure, and undervaluing education. CONCLUSIONS: While GIM divisions overall demonstrate high stress and burnout, division rates vary widely. Sustainability efforts within GIM could focus on visit length, staff support, schedule control, clinic chaos, and EMR stress.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1004-1010
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of general internal medicine
Volume31
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work received funding from Harvard Medical School’s Center for Primary Care. Mr. Menk was supported by NIH Clinical and Translational Science Award 8UL1TR000114-02 at the University of Minnesota.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Society of General Internal Medicine.

Keywords

  • burnout
  • clinician burnout
  • general internal medicine
  • physician satisfaction
  • stress

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Worklife and Wellness in Academic General Internal Medicine: Results from a National Survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this