Wolves adapt territory size, not pack size to local habitat quality

Andrew M. Kittle, Morgan Anderson, Tal Avgar, James A. Baker, Glen S. Brown, Jevon Hagens, Ed Iwachewski, Scott Moffatt, Anna Mosser, Brent R. Patterson, Douglas E.B. Reid, Arthur R. Rodgers, Jen Shuter, Garrett M Street, Ian D. Thompson, Lucas M. Vander Vennen, John M. Fryxell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although local variation in territorial predator density is often correlated with habitat quality, the causal mechanism underlying this frequently observed association is poorly understood and could stem from facultative adjustment in either group size or territory size. To test between these alternative hypotheses, we used a novel statistical framework to construct a winter population-level utilization distribution for wolves (Canis lupus) in northern Ontario, which we then linked to a suite of environmental variables to determine factors influencing wolf space use. Next, we compared habitat quality metrics emerging from this analysis as well as an independent measure of prey abundance, with pack size and territory size to investigate which hypothesis was most supported by the data. We show that wolf space use patterns were concentrated near deciduous, mixed deciduous/coniferous and disturbed forest stands favoured by moose (Alces alces), the predominant prey species in the diet of wolves in northern Ontario, and in proximity to linear corridors, including shorelines and road networks remaining from commercial forestry activities. We then demonstrate that landscape metrics of wolf habitat quality - projected wolf use, probability of moose occupancy and proportion of preferred land cover classes - were inversely related to territory size but unrelated to pack size. These results suggest that wolves in boreal ecosystems alter territory size, but not pack size, in response to local variation in habitat quality. This could be an adaptive strategy to balance trade-offs between territorial defence costs and energetic gains due to resource acquisition. That pack size was not responsive to habitat quality suggests that variation in group size is influenced by other factors such as intraspecific competition between wolf packs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1177-1186
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Animal Ecology
Volume84
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

wolves
habitat quality
habitats
Alces alces
space use
group size
Ontario
trade balance
Canis lupus
intraspecific competition
land cover
forest stands
roads
shoreline
forestry
energetics
predator
diet
predators
environmental factors

Keywords

  • Anthropogenic disturbance
  • Boreal forest
  • Brownian bridge
  • Generalized least squares
  • Optimal group size
  • Predator density
  • Repeated measures
  • Rubber disc hypothesis
  • Spatial autocorrelation
  • Territoriality

Cite this

Kittle, A. M., Anderson, M., Avgar, T., Baker, J. A., Brown, G. S., Hagens, J., ... Fryxell, J. M. (2015). Wolves adapt territory size, not pack size to local habitat quality. Journal of Animal Ecology, 84(5), 1177-1186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12366

Wolves adapt territory size, not pack size to local habitat quality. / Kittle, Andrew M.; Anderson, Morgan; Avgar, Tal; Baker, James A.; Brown, Glen S.; Hagens, Jevon; Iwachewski, Ed; Moffatt, Scott; Mosser, Anna; Patterson, Brent R.; Reid, Douglas E.B.; Rodgers, Arthur R.; Shuter, Jen; Street, Garrett M; Thompson, Ian D.; Vander Vennen, Lucas M.; Fryxell, John M.

In: Journal of Animal Ecology, Vol. 84, No. 5, 01.09.2015, p. 1177-1186.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kittle, AM, Anderson, M, Avgar, T, Baker, JA, Brown, GS, Hagens, J, Iwachewski, E, Moffatt, S, Mosser, A, Patterson, BR, Reid, DEB, Rodgers, AR, Shuter, J, Street, GM, Thompson, ID, Vander Vennen, LM & Fryxell, JM 2015, 'Wolves adapt territory size, not pack size to local habitat quality', Journal of Animal Ecology, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 1177-1186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12366
Kittle AM, Anderson M, Avgar T, Baker JA, Brown GS, Hagens J et al. Wolves adapt territory size, not pack size to local habitat quality. Journal of Animal Ecology. 2015 Sep 1;84(5):1177-1186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12366
Kittle, Andrew M. ; Anderson, Morgan ; Avgar, Tal ; Baker, James A. ; Brown, Glen S. ; Hagens, Jevon ; Iwachewski, Ed ; Moffatt, Scott ; Mosser, Anna ; Patterson, Brent R. ; Reid, Douglas E.B. ; Rodgers, Arthur R. ; Shuter, Jen ; Street, Garrett M ; Thompson, Ian D. ; Vander Vennen, Lucas M. ; Fryxell, John M. / Wolves adapt territory size, not pack size to local habitat quality. In: Journal of Animal Ecology. 2015 ; Vol. 84, No. 5. pp. 1177-1186.
@article{e084492c4c444d2aa4fcaea5f7cd2654,
title = "Wolves adapt territory size, not pack size to local habitat quality",
abstract = "Although local variation in territorial predator density is often correlated with habitat quality, the causal mechanism underlying this frequently observed association is poorly understood and could stem from facultative adjustment in either group size or territory size. To test between these alternative hypotheses, we used a novel statistical framework to construct a winter population-level utilization distribution for wolves (Canis lupus) in northern Ontario, which we then linked to a suite of environmental variables to determine factors influencing wolf space use. Next, we compared habitat quality metrics emerging from this analysis as well as an independent measure of prey abundance, with pack size and territory size to investigate which hypothesis was most supported by the data. We show that wolf space use patterns were concentrated near deciduous, mixed deciduous/coniferous and disturbed forest stands favoured by moose (Alces alces), the predominant prey species in the diet of wolves in northern Ontario, and in proximity to linear corridors, including shorelines and road networks remaining from commercial forestry activities. We then demonstrate that landscape metrics of wolf habitat quality - projected wolf use, probability of moose occupancy and proportion of preferred land cover classes - were inversely related to territory size but unrelated to pack size. These results suggest that wolves in boreal ecosystems alter territory size, but not pack size, in response to local variation in habitat quality. This could be an adaptive strategy to balance trade-offs between territorial defence costs and energetic gains due to resource acquisition. That pack size was not responsive to habitat quality suggests that variation in group size is influenced by other factors such as intraspecific competition between wolf packs.",
keywords = "Anthropogenic disturbance, Boreal forest, Brownian bridge, Generalized least squares, Optimal group size, Predator density, Repeated measures, Rubber disc hypothesis, Spatial autocorrelation, Territoriality",
author = "Kittle, {Andrew M.} and Morgan Anderson and Tal Avgar and Baker, {James A.} and Brown, {Glen S.} and Jevon Hagens and Ed Iwachewski and Scott Moffatt and Anna Mosser and Patterson, {Brent R.} and Reid, {Douglas E.B.} and Rodgers, {Arthur R.} and Jen Shuter and Street, {Garrett M} and Thompson, {Ian D.} and {Vander Vennen}, {Lucas M.} and Fryxell, {John M.}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1365-2656.12366",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "1177--1186",
journal = "Journal of Animal Ecology",
issn = "0021-8790",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wolves adapt territory size, not pack size to local habitat quality

AU - Kittle, Andrew M.

AU - Anderson, Morgan

AU - Avgar, Tal

AU - Baker, James A.

AU - Brown, Glen S.

AU - Hagens, Jevon

AU - Iwachewski, Ed

AU - Moffatt, Scott

AU - Mosser, Anna

AU - Patterson, Brent R.

AU - Reid, Douglas E.B.

AU - Rodgers, Arthur R.

AU - Shuter, Jen

AU - Street, Garrett M

AU - Thompson, Ian D.

AU - Vander Vennen, Lucas M.

AU - Fryxell, John M.

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Although local variation in territorial predator density is often correlated with habitat quality, the causal mechanism underlying this frequently observed association is poorly understood and could stem from facultative adjustment in either group size or territory size. To test between these alternative hypotheses, we used a novel statistical framework to construct a winter population-level utilization distribution for wolves (Canis lupus) in northern Ontario, which we then linked to a suite of environmental variables to determine factors influencing wolf space use. Next, we compared habitat quality metrics emerging from this analysis as well as an independent measure of prey abundance, with pack size and territory size to investigate which hypothesis was most supported by the data. We show that wolf space use patterns were concentrated near deciduous, mixed deciduous/coniferous and disturbed forest stands favoured by moose (Alces alces), the predominant prey species in the diet of wolves in northern Ontario, and in proximity to linear corridors, including shorelines and road networks remaining from commercial forestry activities. We then demonstrate that landscape metrics of wolf habitat quality - projected wolf use, probability of moose occupancy and proportion of preferred land cover classes - were inversely related to territory size but unrelated to pack size. These results suggest that wolves in boreal ecosystems alter territory size, but not pack size, in response to local variation in habitat quality. This could be an adaptive strategy to balance trade-offs between territorial defence costs and energetic gains due to resource acquisition. That pack size was not responsive to habitat quality suggests that variation in group size is influenced by other factors such as intraspecific competition between wolf packs.

AB - Although local variation in territorial predator density is often correlated with habitat quality, the causal mechanism underlying this frequently observed association is poorly understood and could stem from facultative adjustment in either group size or territory size. To test between these alternative hypotheses, we used a novel statistical framework to construct a winter population-level utilization distribution for wolves (Canis lupus) in northern Ontario, which we then linked to a suite of environmental variables to determine factors influencing wolf space use. Next, we compared habitat quality metrics emerging from this analysis as well as an independent measure of prey abundance, with pack size and territory size to investigate which hypothesis was most supported by the data. We show that wolf space use patterns were concentrated near deciduous, mixed deciduous/coniferous and disturbed forest stands favoured by moose (Alces alces), the predominant prey species in the diet of wolves in northern Ontario, and in proximity to linear corridors, including shorelines and road networks remaining from commercial forestry activities. We then demonstrate that landscape metrics of wolf habitat quality - projected wolf use, probability of moose occupancy and proportion of preferred land cover classes - were inversely related to territory size but unrelated to pack size. These results suggest that wolves in boreal ecosystems alter territory size, but not pack size, in response to local variation in habitat quality. This could be an adaptive strategy to balance trade-offs between territorial defence costs and energetic gains due to resource acquisition. That pack size was not responsive to habitat quality suggests that variation in group size is influenced by other factors such as intraspecific competition between wolf packs.

KW - Anthropogenic disturbance

KW - Boreal forest

KW - Brownian bridge

KW - Generalized least squares

KW - Optimal group size

KW - Predator density

KW - Repeated measures

KW - Rubber disc hypothesis

KW - Spatial autocorrelation

KW - Territoriality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939264445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939264445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1365-2656.12366

DO - 10.1111/1365-2656.12366

M3 - Article

VL - 84

SP - 1177

EP - 1186

JO - Journal of Animal Ecology

JF - Journal of Animal Ecology

SN - 0021-8790

IS - 5

ER -