Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Window of opportunity evaluation of blood–brain barrier permeability heterogeneity within and across high-grade glioma patients

  • Ju Hee Oh
  • , Sarah K. Reed
  • , Cecile Riviere-Cazaux
  • , Minjee Kim
  • , Ann C. Mladek
  • , Silvia M. Illamola
  • , Wenjuan Zhang
  • , Rachael A. Vaubel
  • , Alissa Caron
  • , Michael S. Regan
  • , Angela K. Birnbaum
  • , Afroz Mohammad
  • , Wenqiu Zhang
  • , Jesse G. Dixon
  • , Timothy J. Kaufmann
  • , Leland S. Hu
  • , Daniel J. Ma
  • , Sani Kizilbash
  • , Nathalie Y.R. Agar
  • , Caterina Giannini
  • Susan M. Geyer, Ian F. Parney, Evanthia Galanis, Terry C. Burns, William F. Elmquist, Jann N. Sarkaria

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Background Disruption of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) in high-grade brain tumors is characterized by contrast accumulation on diagnostic imaging. This window of opportunity study correlates contrast imaging features with the tumor distribution of BBB-permeable (levetiracetam) and -impermeable (cefazolin) drugs. Methods Patients with a clinical diagnosis of a high-grade brain tumor underwent MRI for surgical planning. Cefazolin and levetiracetam were administered prior to skin incision, and serial plasma and image-registered tumor samples were collected during the operation. Drug levels were measured by LC-MS/MS, tissue drug levels were corrected for residual blood, and tumor-to-plasma concentration ratios were calculated. Intraoperative microdialysis was performed in a subset of patients to measure the same two drugs. Results Tumor (n = 125) and plasma (n = 261) samples were available for analysis from 42 operative cases. Across all samples, the tumor-to-plasma ratio was significantly lower for cefazolin (marginal mean [MM]: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.11–0.19) as compared to levetiracetam (MM: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.64–0.75; P <.001). When compared between contrast-enhancing and non-enhancing regions, tumor-to-plasma ratios for cefazolin varied by 4.4-fold (0.27, 95% CI: 0.20–0.35 vs. 0.06, 95% CI: 0.04–0.08, respectively; P <.001), and varied for levetiracetam by 1.4-fold (0.88, 95% CI: 0.78–0.97 vs. 0.61, 95% CI: 0.55–0.66, respectively; P <.001). These results were confirmed with the intra-operative microdialysis and a population pharmacokinetic analysis. Conclusions This study demonstrates significant inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity in drug delivery for both levetiracetam and cefazolin within high-grade brain tumors that is not necessarily predicted by clinical MR imaging and may reflect tumor-induced changes in both perfusion and BBB integrity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)130-142
Number of pages13
JournalNeuro-Oncology
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • blood–brain barrier
  • glioblastoma
  • high-grade glioma
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • window of opportunity

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Window of opportunity evaluation of blood–brain barrier permeability heterogeneity within and across high-grade glioma patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this