Why Traditional Metrics May Not Adequately Represent Ethnic Minority Psychology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations


The first Perspectives on Psychological Science symposium on eminence in psychology focused almost exclusively on “traditional” markers of success (e.g., citation counts, awards, grants). In this essay, I argue that the context of the research and the context of the researchers are crucial components of ethnic minority psychology. First, I describe structural reasons for why ethnic minority researchers might have less impressive traditional markers of success; then, I highlight how the “minority tax” contours the scholarly activities of ethnic minority researchers. Any conceptualization of eminence must take these additional considerations into account.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1162-1165
Number of pages4
JournalPerspectives on Psychological Science
Issue number6
StatePublished - Nov 1 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © The Author(s) 2017.


  • culture
  • diversity
  • scientific methodology


Dive into the research topics of 'Why Traditional Metrics May Not Adequately Represent Ethnic Minority Psychology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this