TY - JOUR
T1 - Why healthcare workers don't wash their hands
T2 - A behavioral explanation
AU - Whitby, Michael
AU - McLaws, Mary Louise
AU - Ross, Michael W.
PY - 2006/5
Y1 - 2006/5
N2 - OBJECTIVE. To elucidate behavioral determinants of handwashing among nurses. DESIGN. Statistical modeling using the Theory of Planned Behavior and relevant components to handwashing behavior by nurses that were derived from focus-group discussions and literature review. SETTING. The community and 3 tertiary care hospitals. PARTICIPANTS. Children aged 9-10 years, mothers, and nurses. RESULTS. Responses from 754 nurses were analyzed using backward linear regression for handwashing intention. We reasoned that handwashing results in 2 distinct behavioral practices-inherent handwashing and elective handwashing-with our model explaining 64% and 76%, respectively, of the variance in behavioral intention. Translation of community handwashing behavior to healthcare settings is the predominant driver of all handwashing, both inherent (weighted β = 2.92) and elective (weighted β = 4.1). Intended elective in-hospital handwashing behavior is further significantly predicted by nurses' beliefs in the benefits of the activity (weighted β = 3.12), peer pressure of senior physicians (weighted β = 3.0) and administrators (weighted β = 2.2), and role modeling (weighted β = 3.0) but only to a minimal extent by reduction in effort (weighted β = 1.13). Inherent community behavior (weighted β = 2.92), attitudes (weighted β = 0.84), and peer behavior (weighted β = 1.08) were strongly predictive of inherent handwashing intent. CONCLUSIONS. A small increase in handwashing adherence may be seen after implementing the use of alcoholic hand rubs, to decrease the effort required to wash hands. However, the facilitation of compliance is not simply related to effort but is highly dependent on altering behavioral perceptions. Thus, introduction of hand rub alone without an associated behavioral modification program is unlikely to induce a sustained increase in hand hygiene compliance.
AB - OBJECTIVE. To elucidate behavioral determinants of handwashing among nurses. DESIGN. Statistical modeling using the Theory of Planned Behavior and relevant components to handwashing behavior by nurses that were derived from focus-group discussions and literature review. SETTING. The community and 3 tertiary care hospitals. PARTICIPANTS. Children aged 9-10 years, mothers, and nurses. RESULTS. Responses from 754 nurses were analyzed using backward linear regression for handwashing intention. We reasoned that handwashing results in 2 distinct behavioral practices-inherent handwashing and elective handwashing-with our model explaining 64% and 76%, respectively, of the variance in behavioral intention. Translation of community handwashing behavior to healthcare settings is the predominant driver of all handwashing, both inherent (weighted β = 2.92) and elective (weighted β = 4.1). Intended elective in-hospital handwashing behavior is further significantly predicted by nurses' beliefs in the benefits of the activity (weighted β = 3.12), peer pressure of senior physicians (weighted β = 3.0) and administrators (weighted β = 2.2), and role modeling (weighted β = 3.0) but only to a minimal extent by reduction in effort (weighted β = 1.13). Inherent community behavior (weighted β = 2.92), attitudes (weighted β = 0.84), and peer behavior (weighted β = 1.08) were strongly predictive of inherent handwashing intent. CONCLUSIONS. A small increase in handwashing adherence may be seen after implementing the use of alcoholic hand rubs, to decrease the effort required to wash hands. However, the facilitation of compliance is not simply related to effort but is highly dependent on altering behavioral perceptions. Thus, introduction of hand rub alone without an associated behavioral modification program is unlikely to induce a sustained increase in hand hygiene compliance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645056816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645056816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/503335
DO - 10.1086/503335
M3 - Review article
C2 - 16671030
AN - SCOPUS:33645056816
SN - 0899-823X
VL - 27
SP - 484
EP - 492
JO - Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
JF - Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
IS - 5
ER -