Why are there more arboreal ant species in primary than in secondary tropical forests?

Petr Klimes, Cliffson Idigel, Maling Rimandai, Tom M. Fayle, Milan Janda, George D. Weiblen, Vojtech Novotny

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Species diversity of arboreal arthropods tends to increase during rainforest succession so that primary forest communities comprise more species than those from secondary vegetation, but it is not well understood why. Primary forests differ from secondary forests in a wide array of factors whose relative impacts on arthropod diversity have not yet been quantified. We assessed the effects of succession-related determinants on a keystone ecological group, arboreal ants, by conducting a complete census of 1332 ant nests from all trees with diameter at breast height≥5cm occurring within two (unreplicated) 0·32-ha plots, one in primary and one in secondary lowland forest in New Guinea. Specifically, we used a novel rarefaction-based approach to match number, size distribution and taxonomic structure of trees in primary forest communities to those in secondary forest and compared the resulting numbers of ant species. In total, we recorded 80 nesting ant species from 389 trees in primary forest but only 42 species from 295 trees in secondary forest. The two habitats did not differ in the mean number of ant species per tree or in the relationship between ant diversity and tree size. However, the between-tree similarity of ant communities was higher in secondary forest than in primary forest, as was the between-tree nest site similarity, suggesting that secondary trees were more uniform in providing nesting microhabitats. Using our rarefaction method, the difference in ant species richness between two forest types was partitioned according to the effects of higher tree density (22·6%), larger tree size (15·5%) and higher taxonomic diversity of trees (14·3%) in primary than in secondary forest. The remaining difference (47·6%) was because of higher beta diversity of ant communities between primary forest trees. In contrast, difference in nest density was explained solely by difference in tree density. Our study shows that reduction in plant taxonomic diversity in secondary forests is not the main driver of the reduction in canopy ant species richness. We suggest that the majority of arboreal species losses in secondary tropical forests are attributable to simpler vegetation structure, combined with lower turnover of nesting microhabitats between trees.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1103-1112
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Animal Ecology
Volume81
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2012

Fingerprint

secondary forest
secondary forests
tropical forests
tropical forest
ant
Formicidae
primary forests
forest communities
microhabitat
arthropod
species diversity
nest
microhabitats
arthropods
species richness
arboreal species
nest site
ant nests
vegetation structure
New Guinea

Keywords

  • Diversity partitioning
  • Formicidae
  • Habitat disturbance
  • Insects
  • Species density
  • Tree canopies
  • Tropical ecosystems

Cite this

Why are there more arboreal ant species in primary than in secondary tropical forests? / Klimes, Petr; Idigel, Cliffson; Rimandai, Maling; Fayle, Tom M.; Janda, Milan; Weiblen, George D.; Novotny, Vojtech.

In: Journal of Animal Ecology, Vol. 81, No. 5, 01.09.2012, p. 1103-1112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Klimes, Petr ; Idigel, Cliffson ; Rimandai, Maling ; Fayle, Tom M. ; Janda, Milan ; Weiblen, George D. ; Novotny, Vojtech. / Why are there more arboreal ant species in primary than in secondary tropical forests?. In: Journal of Animal Ecology. 2012 ; Vol. 81, No. 5. pp. 1103-1112.
@article{81e65794974547b0be955a727789df2c,
title = "Why are there more arboreal ant species in primary than in secondary tropical forests?",
abstract = "Species diversity of arboreal arthropods tends to increase during rainforest succession so that primary forest communities comprise more species than those from secondary vegetation, but it is not well understood why. Primary forests differ from secondary forests in a wide array of factors whose relative impacts on arthropod diversity have not yet been quantified. We assessed the effects of succession-related determinants on a keystone ecological group, arboreal ants, by conducting a complete census of 1332 ant nests from all trees with diameter at breast height≥5cm occurring within two (unreplicated) 0·32-ha plots, one in primary and one in secondary lowland forest in New Guinea. Specifically, we used a novel rarefaction-based approach to match number, size distribution and taxonomic structure of trees in primary forest communities to those in secondary forest and compared the resulting numbers of ant species. In total, we recorded 80 nesting ant species from 389 trees in primary forest but only 42 species from 295 trees in secondary forest. The two habitats did not differ in the mean number of ant species per tree or in the relationship between ant diversity and tree size. However, the between-tree similarity of ant communities was higher in secondary forest than in primary forest, as was the between-tree nest site similarity, suggesting that secondary trees were more uniform in providing nesting microhabitats. Using our rarefaction method, the difference in ant species richness between two forest types was partitioned according to the effects of higher tree density (22·6{\%}), larger tree size (15·5{\%}) and higher taxonomic diversity of trees (14·3{\%}) in primary than in secondary forest. The remaining difference (47·6{\%}) was because of higher beta diversity of ant communities between primary forest trees. In contrast, difference in nest density was explained solely by difference in tree density. Our study shows that reduction in plant taxonomic diversity in secondary forests is not the main driver of the reduction in canopy ant species richness. We suggest that the majority of arboreal species losses in secondary tropical forests are attributable to simpler vegetation structure, combined with lower turnover of nesting microhabitats between trees.",
keywords = "Diversity partitioning, Formicidae, Habitat disturbance, Insects, Species density, Tree canopies, Tropical ecosystems",
author = "Petr Klimes and Cliffson Idigel and Maling Rimandai and Fayle, {Tom M.} and Milan Janda and Weiblen, {George D.} and Vojtech Novotny",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02002.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "81",
pages = "1103--1112",
journal = "Journal of Animal Ecology",
issn = "0021-8790",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why are there more arboreal ant species in primary than in secondary tropical forests?

AU - Klimes, Petr

AU - Idigel, Cliffson

AU - Rimandai, Maling

AU - Fayle, Tom M.

AU - Janda, Milan

AU - Weiblen, George D.

AU - Novotny, Vojtech

PY - 2012/9/1

Y1 - 2012/9/1

N2 - Species diversity of arboreal arthropods tends to increase during rainforest succession so that primary forest communities comprise more species than those from secondary vegetation, but it is not well understood why. Primary forests differ from secondary forests in a wide array of factors whose relative impacts on arthropod diversity have not yet been quantified. We assessed the effects of succession-related determinants on a keystone ecological group, arboreal ants, by conducting a complete census of 1332 ant nests from all trees with diameter at breast height≥5cm occurring within two (unreplicated) 0·32-ha plots, one in primary and one in secondary lowland forest in New Guinea. Specifically, we used a novel rarefaction-based approach to match number, size distribution and taxonomic structure of trees in primary forest communities to those in secondary forest and compared the resulting numbers of ant species. In total, we recorded 80 nesting ant species from 389 trees in primary forest but only 42 species from 295 trees in secondary forest. The two habitats did not differ in the mean number of ant species per tree or in the relationship between ant diversity and tree size. However, the between-tree similarity of ant communities was higher in secondary forest than in primary forest, as was the between-tree nest site similarity, suggesting that secondary trees were more uniform in providing nesting microhabitats. Using our rarefaction method, the difference in ant species richness between two forest types was partitioned according to the effects of higher tree density (22·6%), larger tree size (15·5%) and higher taxonomic diversity of trees (14·3%) in primary than in secondary forest. The remaining difference (47·6%) was because of higher beta diversity of ant communities between primary forest trees. In contrast, difference in nest density was explained solely by difference in tree density. Our study shows that reduction in plant taxonomic diversity in secondary forests is not the main driver of the reduction in canopy ant species richness. We suggest that the majority of arboreal species losses in secondary tropical forests are attributable to simpler vegetation structure, combined with lower turnover of nesting microhabitats between trees.

AB - Species diversity of arboreal arthropods tends to increase during rainforest succession so that primary forest communities comprise more species than those from secondary vegetation, but it is not well understood why. Primary forests differ from secondary forests in a wide array of factors whose relative impacts on arthropod diversity have not yet been quantified. We assessed the effects of succession-related determinants on a keystone ecological group, arboreal ants, by conducting a complete census of 1332 ant nests from all trees with diameter at breast height≥5cm occurring within two (unreplicated) 0·32-ha plots, one in primary and one in secondary lowland forest in New Guinea. Specifically, we used a novel rarefaction-based approach to match number, size distribution and taxonomic structure of trees in primary forest communities to those in secondary forest and compared the resulting numbers of ant species. In total, we recorded 80 nesting ant species from 389 trees in primary forest but only 42 species from 295 trees in secondary forest. The two habitats did not differ in the mean number of ant species per tree or in the relationship between ant diversity and tree size. However, the between-tree similarity of ant communities was higher in secondary forest than in primary forest, as was the between-tree nest site similarity, suggesting that secondary trees were more uniform in providing nesting microhabitats. Using our rarefaction method, the difference in ant species richness between two forest types was partitioned according to the effects of higher tree density (22·6%), larger tree size (15·5%) and higher taxonomic diversity of trees (14·3%) in primary than in secondary forest. The remaining difference (47·6%) was because of higher beta diversity of ant communities between primary forest trees. In contrast, difference in nest density was explained solely by difference in tree density. Our study shows that reduction in plant taxonomic diversity in secondary forests is not the main driver of the reduction in canopy ant species richness. We suggest that the majority of arboreal species losses in secondary tropical forests are attributable to simpler vegetation structure, combined with lower turnover of nesting microhabitats between trees.

KW - Diversity partitioning

KW - Formicidae

KW - Habitat disturbance

KW - Insects

KW - Species density

KW - Tree canopies

KW - Tropical ecosystems

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864915078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864915078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02002.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02002.x

M3 - Article

VL - 81

SP - 1103

EP - 1112

JO - Journal of Animal Ecology

JF - Journal of Animal Ecology

SN - 0021-8790

IS - 5

ER -