Who's being left behind? Uninsured emergency general surgery admissions after the ACA

Paul T. Albini, Megan R. Cochran-Yu, Laura N. Godat, Todd W. Costantini, Jay J. Doucet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) increased Medicaid coverage of Emergency General Surgery (EGS). We hypothesized that despite the ACA, racial and geographic disparities persisted for EGS admissions. Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried from 2012 through Q3 of 2015 for Non-Medicare patient EGS admissions. Difference-in-Differences analyses (DID) compared payors, complications, mortality and costs in pre-ACA years (2012–2013) and post-ACA years (2014-2015Q3). Results: EGS cases fell 9.1% from 1,711,940 to 1,555,033 NIS-weighted cases. Hispanics were still most likely to be uninsured but had improved coverage (OR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.88–0.96, p < 0.001). Risk of uninsured EGS admissions from the South region persisted (OR 1.52, 95% CI: 1.46–1.58, p < 0.001). Uninsured EGS patients had higher DID increased mortality than insured patients (0.31% higher, P = 0.003). Insured group DID costs increased more rapidly than in self-pay Patients (6.0% higher, P = 0.008) Conclusions: Post ACA, risk of uninsured EGS admissions remained highest in the South, in males, and Hispanics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1102-1109
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican journal of surgery
Volume218
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2019
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Inc.

Keywords

  • Affordable care act
  • Difference in differences
  • Emergency general surgery
  • Uninsured

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Who's being left behind? Uninsured emergency general surgery admissions after the ACA'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this