Whole grain intake and cancer: An expanded review and meta analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Whole grains are nutrient-rich and may protect against chronic disease. We previously reviewed 14 case-control studies of colorectal, gastric and endometrial cancers and found consistently lower risk for high versus low whole grain intake. Questions remained concerning other cancers, dietary assessment, quantity consumed, confounding, and differential study quality. Here we expand the review to 40 case-control studies of 20 cancers and colon polyps. Odds ratios were < 1 for 46 of 51 mentions. The pooled odds ratio for high versus low whole grain intake was 0.69 (95% Cl: 0.61, 0.77); consistent across 4 types of dietary questionnaires. Odds ratios were < 1 in 10/13 mentions of studies of colorectal cancers and polyps, 7/8 mentions of gastric and 7/7 of other digestive tract cancers, 7/7 mentions of hormone-related cancers, 4/4 mentions of pancreatic cancer, and 11/12 for 8 other cancers. Most pooled odds ratios for specific cancers were in the range 0.5 - 0.8, notable exceptions being breast (0.86) and prostate (0.90). The pooled odds ratio was similar in studies which adjusted for few or many covariates. Dose-response associations were seen, weakest in studies which used the most detailed questionnaires. A reporting bias is unlikely to explain these results. Any tendency for cases to overreport whole grain intake would bring the observed odds ratio closer to 1. The case-control evidence is supportive of the hypothesis that whole grain intake protects against various cancers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)A875
JournalFASEB Journal
Volume12
Issue number5
StatePublished - Mar 20 1998

Fingerprint

grain consumption
meta-analysis
Meta-Analysis
Odds Ratio
odds ratio
neoplasms
Neoplasms
Polyps
Case-Control Studies
Colorectal Neoplasms
case-control studies
stomach
questionnaires
Nutrients
Endometrial Neoplasms
Pancreatic Neoplasms
pancreatic neoplasms
Colonic Neoplasms
Stomach Neoplasms
Gastrointestinal Tract

Cite this

Whole grain intake and cancer : An expanded review and meta analysis. / Jacobs, D. R.; Marquart, L. F.; Slavin, J.

In: FASEB Journal, Vol. 12, No. 5, 20.03.1998, p. A875.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{a63a5476bd654a31b49ed28fdc25338b,
title = "Whole grain intake and cancer: An expanded review and meta analysis",
abstract = "Whole grains are nutrient-rich and may protect against chronic disease. We previously reviewed 14 case-control studies of colorectal, gastric and endometrial cancers and found consistently lower risk for high versus low whole grain intake. Questions remained concerning other cancers, dietary assessment, quantity consumed, confounding, and differential study quality. Here we expand the review to 40 case-control studies of 20 cancers and colon polyps. Odds ratios were < 1 for 46 of 51 mentions. The pooled odds ratio for high versus low whole grain intake was 0.69 (95{\%} Cl: 0.61, 0.77); consistent across 4 types of dietary questionnaires. Odds ratios were < 1 in 10/13 mentions of studies of colorectal cancers and polyps, 7/8 mentions of gastric and 7/7 of other digestive tract cancers, 7/7 mentions of hormone-related cancers, 4/4 mentions of pancreatic cancer, and 11/12 for 8 other cancers. Most pooled odds ratios for specific cancers were in the range 0.5 - 0.8, notable exceptions being breast (0.86) and prostate (0.90). The pooled odds ratio was similar in studies which adjusted for few or many covariates. Dose-response associations were seen, weakest in studies which used the most detailed questionnaires. A reporting bias is unlikely to explain these results. Any tendency for cases to overreport whole grain intake would bring the observed odds ratio closer to 1. The case-control evidence is supportive of the hypothesis that whole grain intake protects against various cancers.",
author = "Jacobs, {D. R.} and Marquart, {L. F.} and J. Slavin",
year = "1998",
month = "3",
day = "20",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "A875",
journal = "FASEB Journal",
issn = "0892-6638",
publisher = "FASEB",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Whole grain intake and cancer

T2 - An expanded review and meta analysis

AU - Jacobs, D. R.

AU - Marquart, L. F.

AU - Slavin, J.

PY - 1998/3/20

Y1 - 1998/3/20

N2 - Whole grains are nutrient-rich and may protect against chronic disease. We previously reviewed 14 case-control studies of colorectal, gastric and endometrial cancers and found consistently lower risk for high versus low whole grain intake. Questions remained concerning other cancers, dietary assessment, quantity consumed, confounding, and differential study quality. Here we expand the review to 40 case-control studies of 20 cancers and colon polyps. Odds ratios were < 1 for 46 of 51 mentions. The pooled odds ratio for high versus low whole grain intake was 0.69 (95% Cl: 0.61, 0.77); consistent across 4 types of dietary questionnaires. Odds ratios were < 1 in 10/13 mentions of studies of colorectal cancers and polyps, 7/8 mentions of gastric and 7/7 of other digestive tract cancers, 7/7 mentions of hormone-related cancers, 4/4 mentions of pancreatic cancer, and 11/12 for 8 other cancers. Most pooled odds ratios for specific cancers were in the range 0.5 - 0.8, notable exceptions being breast (0.86) and prostate (0.90). The pooled odds ratio was similar in studies which adjusted for few or many covariates. Dose-response associations were seen, weakest in studies which used the most detailed questionnaires. A reporting bias is unlikely to explain these results. Any tendency for cases to overreport whole grain intake would bring the observed odds ratio closer to 1. The case-control evidence is supportive of the hypothesis that whole grain intake protects against various cancers.

AB - Whole grains are nutrient-rich and may protect against chronic disease. We previously reviewed 14 case-control studies of colorectal, gastric and endometrial cancers and found consistently lower risk for high versus low whole grain intake. Questions remained concerning other cancers, dietary assessment, quantity consumed, confounding, and differential study quality. Here we expand the review to 40 case-control studies of 20 cancers and colon polyps. Odds ratios were < 1 for 46 of 51 mentions. The pooled odds ratio for high versus low whole grain intake was 0.69 (95% Cl: 0.61, 0.77); consistent across 4 types of dietary questionnaires. Odds ratios were < 1 in 10/13 mentions of studies of colorectal cancers and polyps, 7/8 mentions of gastric and 7/7 of other digestive tract cancers, 7/7 mentions of hormone-related cancers, 4/4 mentions of pancreatic cancer, and 11/12 for 8 other cancers. Most pooled odds ratios for specific cancers were in the range 0.5 - 0.8, notable exceptions being breast (0.86) and prostate (0.90). The pooled odds ratio was similar in studies which adjusted for few or many covariates. Dose-response associations were seen, weakest in studies which used the most detailed questionnaires. A reporting bias is unlikely to explain these results. Any tendency for cases to overreport whole grain intake would bring the observed odds ratio closer to 1. The case-control evidence is supportive of the hypothesis that whole grain intake protects against various cancers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749286955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749286955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:33749286955

VL - 12

SP - A875

JO - FASEB Journal

JF - FASEB Journal

SN - 0892-6638

IS - 5

ER -