Who survived? Ethiopia's regulatory crackdown on foreign-funded NGOs

Kendra E. Dupuy, James Ron, Aseem Prakash

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

ABSTRACT: How do public regulations shape the composition and behavior of non-governmental organizations (NGOs)? Because many NGOs advocate liberal causes, such as human rights, democracy, and gender equality, they upset the political status quo. At the same time, a large number of NGOs operating in the Global South rely on international funding. This sometimes disconnects from local publics and leads to the proliferation of sham or ‘briefcase’ NGOs. Seeking to rein in the politically inconvenient NGO sector, governments exploit the role of international funding and make the case for restricting the influence of NGOs that serve as foreign agents. To pursue this objective, states worldwide are enacting laws to restrict NGOs’ access to foreign funding. We examine this regulatory offensive through an Ethiopian case study, where recent legislation prohibits foreign-funded NGOs from working on politically sensitive issues. We find that most briefcase NGOs and local human rights groups in Ethiopia have disappeared, while survivors have either ‘rebranded’ or switched their work from proscribed areas. This research note highlights how governments can and do shape the population ecology of the non-governmental sector. Because NGOs seek legitimacy via their claims of grassroots support, a reliance on external funding makes them politically vulnerable. Any study of the NGO sector must include governments as the key component of NGOs’ institutional environment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)419-456
Number of pages38
JournalReview of International Political Economy
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 4 2015

Fingerprint

Ethiopia
funding
Non-governmental organizations
human rights
local public
proliferation
ecology
equality
legitimacy
legislation
democracy
regulation

Keywords

  • Africa
  • Ethiopia
  • NGOs
  • foreign funding
  • human rights
  • regulations

Cite this

Who survived? Ethiopia's regulatory crackdown on foreign-funded NGOs. / Dupuy, Kendra E.; Ron, James; Prakash, Aseem.

In: Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 22, No. 2, 04.03.2015, p. 419-456.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{466a1812e151412bac716a7149fdb111,
title = "Who survived? Ethiopia's regulatory crackdown on foreign-funded NGOs",
abstract = "ABSTRACT: How do public regulations shape the composition and behavior of non-governmental organizations (NGOs)? Because many NGOs advocate liberal causes, such as human rights, democracy, and gender equality, they upset the political status quo. At the same time, a large number of NGOs operating in the Global South rely on international funding. This sometimes disconnects from local publics and leads to the proliferation of sham or ‘briefcase’ NGOs. Seeking to rein in the politically inconvenient NGO sector, governments exploit the role of international funding and make the case for restricting the influence of NGOs that serve as foreign agents. To pursue this objective, states worldwide are enacting laws to restrict NGOs’ access to foreign funding. We examine this regulatory offensive through an Ethiopian case study, where recent legislation prohibits foreign-funded NGOs from working on politically sensitive issues. We find that most briefcase NGOs and local human rights groups in Ethiopia have disappeared, while survivors have either ‘rebranded’ or switched their work from proscribed areas. This research note highlights how governments can and do shape the population ecology of the non-governmental sector. Because NGOs seek legitimacy via their claims of grassroots support, a reliance on external funding makes them politically vulnerable. Any study of the NGO sector must include governments as the key component of NGOs’ institutional environment.",
keywords = "Africa, Ethiopia, NGOs, foreign funding, human rights, regulations",
author = "Dupuy, {Kendra E.} and James Ron and Aseem Prakash",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/09692290.2014.903854",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "419--456",
journal = "Review of International Political Economy",
issn = "0969-2290",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who survived? Ethiopia's regulatory crackdown on foreign-funded NGOs

AU - Dupuy, Kendra E.

AU - Ron, James

AU - Prakash, Aseem

PY - 2015/3/4

Y1 - 2015/3/4

N2 - ABSTRACT: How do public regulations shape the composition and behavior of non-governmental organizations (NGOs)? Because many NGOs advocate liberal causes, such as human rights, democracy, and gender equality, they upset the political status quo. At the same time, a large number of NGOs operating in the Global South rely on international funding. This sometimes disconnects from local publics and leads to the proliferation of sham or ‘briefcase’ NGOs. Seeking to rein in the politically inconvenient NGO sector, governments exploit the role of international funding and make the case for restricting the influence of NGOs that serve as foreign agents. To pursue this objective, states worldwide are enacting laws to restrict NGOs’ access to foreign funding. We examine this regulatory offensive through an Ethiopian case study, where recent legislation prohibits foreign-funded NGOs from working on politically sensitive issues. We find that most briefcase NGOs and local human rights groups in Ethiopia have disappeared, while survivors have either ‘rebranded’ or switched their work from proscribed areas. This research note highlights how governments can and do shape the population ecology of the non-governmental sector. Because NGOs seek legitimacy via their claims of grassroots support, a reliance on external funding makes them politically vulnerable. Any study of the NGO sector must include governments as the key component of NGOs’ institutional environment.

AB - ABSTRACT: How do public regulations shape the composition and behavior of non-governmental organizations (NGOs)? Because many NGOs advocate liberal causes, such as human rights, democracy, and gender equality, they upset the political status quo. At the same time, a large number of NGOs operating in the Global South rely on international funding. This sometimes disconnects from local publics and leads to the proliferation of sham or ‘briefcase’ NGOs. Seeking to rein in the politically inconvenient NGO sector, governments exploit the role of international funding and make the case for restricting the influence of NGOs that serve as foreign agents. To pursue this objective, states worldwide are enacting laws to restrict NGOs’ access to foreign funding. We examine this regulatory offensive through an Ethiopian case study, where recent legislation prohibits foreign-funded NGOs from working on politically sensitive issues. We find that most briefcase NGOs and local human rights groups in Ethiopia have disappeared, while survivors have either ‘rebranded’ or switched their work from proscribed areas. This research note highlights how governments can and do shape the population ecology of the non-governmental sector. Because NGOs seek legitimacy via their claims of grassroots support, a reliance on external funding makes them politically vulnerable. Any study of the NGO sector must include governments as the key component of NGOs’ institutional environment.

KW - Africa

KW - Ethiopia

KW - NGOs

KW - foreign funding

KW - human rights

KW - regulations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928279682&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928279682&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09692290.2014.903854

DO - 10.1080/09692290.2014.903854

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 419

EP - 456

JO - Review of International Political Economy

JF - Review of International Political Economy

SN - 0969-2290

IS - 2

ER -