TY - JOUR
T1 - WHO IS LEAVING AND WHY? THE DYNAMICS OF HIGH-QUALITY HUMAN CAPITAL OUTFLOWS
AU - Sajjadiani, Sima
AU - Kammeyer-Mueller, John
AU - Benson, Alan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Academy of Management. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - This study proposes a unified, dynamic framework based on turnover event theory to evaluate the effects of dismissals, layoff announcements, and voluntary turnover on subsequent work-unit voluntary turnover. Applying our approach to 1,620 retail stores over 22 months, we show that modeling exit events as a dynamic and interdependent system adds to our ability to predict subsequent human capital outflow. Dismissals had the weakest total effect on subsequent voluntary turnover, layoff announcements had the strongest and most immediate effects, and voluntary turnovers had moderate but lasting effects.We also find that these three exit reasons each exhibit a distinct pattern of subsequent turnover intensity and longevity. Based on characteristics of work units in our setting, our results correspond to a cumulative worker-level average effect of 0.17 quits following dismissals, 0.23 quits following quits, and 2.2 quits following a layoff. We find that these "multiplier" effects are concentrated among workers of similar performance: high performer exits beget high performer quits, just as low-performer exits beget lowperformer quits. Our findings suggest analyses offering individual-level estimates of turnover will generally underestimate the broader,work-unit level consequences of individual exit events on similar workers.
AB - This study proposes a unified, dynamic framework based on turnover event theory to evaluate the effects of dismissals, layoff announcements, and voluntary turnover on subsequent work-unit voluntary turnover. Applying our approach to 1,620 retail stores over 22 months, we show that modeling exit events as a dynamic and interdependent system adds to our ability to predict subsequent human capital outflow. Dismissals had the weakest total effect on subsequent voluntary turnover, layoff announcements had the strongest and most immediate effects, and voluntary turnovers had moderate but lasting effects.We also find that these three exit reasons each exhibit a distinct pattern of subsequent turnover intensity and longevity. Based on characteristics of work units in our setting, our results correspond to a cumulative worker-level average effect of 0.17 quits following dismissals, 0.23 quits following quits, and 2.2 quits following a layoff. We find that these "multiplier" effects are concentrated among workers of similar performance: high performer exits beget high performer quits, just as low-performer exits beget lowperformer quits. Our findings suggest analyses offering individual-level estimates of turnover will generally underestimate the broader,work-unit level consequences of individual exit events on similar workers.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85181244379
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85181244379&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5465/amj.2021.1327
DO - 10.5465/amj.2021.1327
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85181244379
SN - 0001-4273
VL - 66
SP - 1929
EP - 1953
JO - Academy of Management Journal
JF - Academy of Management Journal
IS - 6
ER -