"Who gets in?": Recruitment and screening processes of outpatient substance abuse trials

Shelly L. Sayre, Mark Evans, Patricia S. Hokanson, Joy M. Schmitz, Angela L. Stotts, Patricia Averill, John Grabowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A brief telephone-screening interview was conducted with 1759 callers seeking treatment for substance abuse at the Treatment Research Clinic (TRC) over a 16-month period. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of various recruitment methods in attracting eligible participants and to identify screening variables that characterized eligible and ineligible callers. Callers referred by friends and family were more likely to be eligible than callers from other referral sources. Callers seeking treatment for cocaine abuse who reported more severe alcohol/substance problems were more likely to be eligible for treatment protocols, while those with severe problems in other psychosocial areas (legal, medical, and psychiatric) were more often excluded. Alcohol- and nicotine-dependent callers reporting severe alcohol problems were more likely to be eligible but otherwise were not different from callers who were ineligible. The effectiveness of recruitment methods may not be the same for different types of substance use disorders. This study underscores the importance of having a sensitive screening assessment for recruiting a homogenous yet representative sample for outpatient substance abuse clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)389-398
Number of pages10
JournalAddictive Behaviors
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2004

Fingerprint

Substance-Related Disorders
Screening
Outpatients
Alcohols
Cocaine-Related Disorders
Clinical Protocols
Nicotine
Cocaine
Telephone
Psychiatry
Therapeutics
Referral and Consultation
Clinical Trials
Interviews
Research

Keywords

  • Clinical trials
  • Eligibility
  • Outpatient
  • Recruitment
  • Screening
  • Substance abuse

Cite this

Sayre, S. L., Evans, M., Hokanson, P. S., Schmitz, J. M., Stotts, A. L., Averill, P., & Grabowski, J. (2004). "Who gets in?": Recruitment and screening processes of outpatient substance abuse trials. Addictive Behaviors, 29(2), 389-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2003.08.010

"Who gets in?" : Recruitment and screening processes of outpatient substance abuse trials. / Sayre, Shelly L.; Evans, Mark; Hokanson, Patricia S.; Schmitz, Joy M.; Stotts, Angela L.; Averill, Patricia; Grabowski, John.

In: Addictive Behaviors, Vol. 29, No. 2, 02.2004, p. 389-398.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sayre, SL, Evans, M, Hokanson, PS, Schmitz, JM, Stotts, AL, Averill, P & Grabowski, J 2004, '"Who gets in?": Recruitment and screening processes of outpatient substance abuse trials', Addictive Behaviors, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 389-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2003.08.010
Sayre, Shelly L. ; Evans, Mark ; Hokanson, Patricia S. ; Schmitz, Joy M. ; Stotts, Angela L. ; Averill, Patricia ; Grabowski, John. / "Who gets in?" : Recruitment and screening processes of outpatient substance abuse trials. In: Addictive Behaviors. 2004 ; Vol. 29, No. 2. pp. 389-398.
@article{7235c320da3947339e32955004287340,
title = "{"}Who gets in?{"}: Recruitment and screening processes of outpatient substance abuse trials",
abstract = "A brief telephone-screening interview was conducted with 1759 callers seeking treatment for substance abuse at the Treatment Research Clinic (TRC) over a 16-month period. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of various recruitment methods in attracting eligible participants and to identify screening variables that characterized eligible and ineligible callers. Callers referred by friends and family were more likely to be eligible than callers from other referral sources. Callers seeking treatment for cocaine abuse who reported more severe alcohol/substance problems were more likely to be eligible for treatment protocols, while those with severe problems in other psychosocial areas (legal, medical, and psychiatric) were more often excluded. Alcohol- and nicotine-dependent callers reporting severe alcohol problems were more likely to be eligible but otherwise were not different from callers who were ineligible. The effectiveness of recruitment methods may not be the same for different types of substance use disorders. This study underscores the importance of having a sensitive screening assessment for recruiting a homogenous yet representative sample for outpatient substance abuse clinical trials.",
keywords = "Clinical trials, Eligibility, Outpatient, Recruitment, Screening, Substance abuse",
author = "Sayre, {Shelly L.} and Mark Evans and Hokanson, {Patricia S.} and Schmitz, {Joy M.} and Stotts, {Angela L.} and Patricia Averill and John Grabowski",
year = "2004",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.addbeh.2003.08.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "389--398",
journal = "Addictive Behaviors",
issn = "0306-4603",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Who gets in?"

T2 - Recruitment and screening processes of outpatient substance abuse trials

AU - Sayre, Shelly L.

AU - Evans, Mark

AU - Hokanson, Patricia S.

AU - Schmitz, Joy M.

AU - Stotts, Angela L.

AU - Averill, Patricia

AU - Grabowski, John

PY - 2004/2

Y1 - 2004/2

N2 - A brief telephone-screening interview was conducted with 1759 callers seeking treatment for substance abuse at the Treatment Research Clinic (TRC) over a 16-month period. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of various recruitment methods in attracting eligible participants and to identify screening variables that characterized eligible and ineligible callers. Callers referred by friends and family were more likely to be eligible than callers from other referral sources. Callers seeking treatment for cocaine abuse who reported more severe alcohol/substance problems were more likely to be eligible for treatment protocols, while those with severe problems in other psychosocial areas (legal, medical, and psychiatric) were more often excluded. Alcohol- and nicotine-dependent callers reporting severe alcohol problems were more likely to be eligible but otherwise were not different from callers who were ineligible. The effectiveness of recruitment methods may not be the same for different types of substance use disorders. This study underscores the importance of having a sensitive screening assessment for recruiting a homogenous yet representative sample for outpatient substance abuse clinical trials.

AB - A brief telephone-screening interview was conducted with 1759 callers seeking treatment for substance abuse at the Treatment Research Clinic (TRC) over a 16-month period. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of various recruitment methods in attracting eligible participants and to identify screening variables that characterized eligible and ineligible callers. Callers referred by friends and family were more likely to be eligible than callers from other referral sources. Callers seeking treatment for cocaine abuse who reported more severe alcohol/substance problems were more likely to be eligible for treatment protocols, while those with severe problems in other psychosocial areas (legal, medical, and psychiatric) were more often excluded. Alcohol- and nicotine-dependent callers reporting severe alcohol problems were more likely to be eligible but otherwise were not different from callers who were ineligible. The effectiveness of recruitment methods may not be the same for different types of substance use disorders. This study underscores the importance of having a sensitive screening assessment for recruiting a homogenous yet representative sample for outpatient substance abuse clinical trials.

KW - Clinical trials

KW - Eligibility

KW - Outpatient

KW - Recruitment

KW - Screening

KW - Substance abuse

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0347091691&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0347091691&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.addbeh.2003.08.010

DO - 10.1016/j.addbeh.2003.08.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 14732428

AN - SCOPUS:0347091691

VL - 29

SP - 389

EP - 398

JO - Addictive Behaviors

JF - Addictive Behaviors

SN - 0306-4603

IS - 2

ER -