When “Tried and True” Advocacy Strategies Backfire: Narrative Messages Can Undermine State Legislator Support for Early Childcare Policies

Liana B. Winett, Jeff Niederdeppe, Yiwei Xu, Sarah Gollust, Erika Franklin Fowler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

A core principle of policy advocacy is that to engage decision makers in the urgency, complexity, and controversy of problems, advocates must effectively tell the story of those issues. Policy stories, or narratives, paint mental pictures of what a problem is, who is affected, and how it came to be. Yet, the persuasive effects of narratives on one key group, state legislators, remain understudied. Drawing from the Narrative Policy Framework (NPF), media advocacy, and public interest communications, we sought to inform advocacy strategy by illuminating state legislators’ responses to messages about public investments in quality childcare for all. Contrary to expectations, we found that narratives can have unintended effects challenging or even diminishing legislator support. We discuss implications for advocacy strategy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)45-77
Number of pages33
JournalJournal of Public Interest Communications
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 13 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Advocacy
  • Early childcare
  • Narrative
  • Public policy
  • State legislator

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When “Tried and True” Advocacy Strategies Backfire: Narrative Messages Can Undermine State Legislator Support for Early Childcare Policies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this