When the WBB is useful, and when it isn't.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Access

@article{697fecd9cb47422f8028cf31cca55580,

title = "When the WBB is useful, and when it isn't.",

author = "Stoffregen, {Thomas A.} and Bardy, {Beno{\^i}t G.}",

year = "2014",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.12.014",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "39",

pages = "1154; discussion 1158--1161",

journal = "Gait and Posture",

issn = "0966-6362",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When the WBB is useful, and when it isn't.

AU - Stoffregen, Thomas A.

AU - Bardy, Benoît G.

PY - 2014/4

Y1 - 2014/4

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907609467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907609467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.12.014

DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.12.014

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 24809102

AN - SCOPUS:84907609467

VL - 39

SP - 1154; discussion 1158-1161

JO - Gait and Posture

JF - Gait and Posture

SN - 0966-6362

IS - 4

ER -