What we know: Findings that every theory of Schizophrenia should explain

Angus W. MacDonald, S. Charles Schulz

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

88 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The article summarizes the process used to distill schizophrenia science into 22 facts. These facts consist of 6 basic facts, 3 etiological facts, 6 pharmacological and treatment facts, 5 pathology facts, and 2 behavioral facts that were critically reviewed by the scholarly community through a special initiative in cooperation with the Schizophrenia Research Forum. A subset of 10 of these facts was selected to form a common set of findings to be explained from the different theoretical perspectives included in this special section of Schizophrenia Bulletin. The rationale for this exercise is to distinguish more precisely the areas of agreement and disagreement between theories of schizophrenia and to highlight where more thought and data can make the greatest impact for understanding this disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)493-508
Number of pages16
JournalSchizophrenia bulletin
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2009

Fingerprint

Schizophrenia
Pharmacology
Pathology
Research

Keywords

  • Meta-analysis
  • Review
  • Schizophrenia
  • Theory

Cite this

What we know : Findings that every theory of Schizophrenia should explain. / MacDonald, Angus W.; Schulz, S. Charles.

In: Schizophrenia bulletin, Vol. 35, No. 3, 01.05.2009, p. 493-508.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{698ce5c61f5b44c0a846c79eb70155c3,
title = "What we know: Findings that every theory of Schizophrenia should explain",
abstract = "The article summarizes the process used to distill schizophrenia science into 22 facts. These facts consist of 6 basic facts, 3 etiological facts, 6 pharmacological and treatment facts, 5 pathology facts, and 2 behavioral facts that were critically reviewed by the scholarly community through a special initiative in cooperation with the Schizophrenia Research Forum. A subset of 10 of these facts was selected to form a common set of findings to be explained from the different theoretical perspectives included in this special section of Schizophrenia Bulletin. The rationale for this exercise is to distinguish more precisely the areas of agreement and disagreement between theories of schizophrenia and to highlight where more thought and data can make the greatest impact for understanding this disease.",
keywords = "Meta-analysis, Review, Schizophrenia, Theory",
author = "MacDonald, {Angus W.} and Schulz, {S. Charles}",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/schbul/sbp017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "493--508",
journal = "Schizophrenia Bulletin",
issn = "0586-7614",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What we know

T2 - Findings that every theory of Schizophrenia should explain

AU - MacDonald, Angus W.

AU - Schulz, S. Charles

PY - 2009/5/1

Y1 - 2009/5/1

N2 - The article summarizes the process used to distill schizophrenia science into 22 facts. These facts consist of 6 basic facts, 3 etiological facts, 6 pharmacological and treatment facts, 5 pathology facts, and 2 behavioral facts that were critically reviewed by the scholarly community through a special initiative in cooperation with the Schizophrenia Research Forum. A subset of 10 of these facts was selected to form a common set of findings to be explained from the different theoretical perspectives included in this special section of Schizophrenia Bulletin. The rationale for this exercise is to distinguish more precisely the areas of agreement and disagreement between theories of schizophrenia and to highlight where more thought and data can make the greatest impact for understanding this disease.

AB - The article summarizes the process used to distill schizophrenia science into 22 facts. These facts consist of 6 basic facts, 3 etiological facts, 6 pharmacological and treatment facts, 5 pathology facts, and 2 behavioral facts that were critically reviewed by the scholarly community through a special initiative in cooperation with the Schizophrenia Research Forum. A subset of 10 of these facts was selected to form a common set of findings to be explained from the different theoretical perspectives included in this special section of Schizophrenia Bulletin. The rationale for this exercise is to distinguish more precisely the areas of agreement and disagreement between theories of schizophrenia and to highlight where more thought and data can make the greatest impact for understanding this disease.

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Review

KW - Schizophrenia

KW - Theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65349088024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65349088024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/schbul/sbp017

DO - 10.1093/schbul/sbp017

M3 - Review article

C2 - 19329559

AN - SCOPUS:65349088024

VL - 35

SP - 493

EP - 508

JO - Schizophrenia Bulletin

JF - Schizophrenia Bulletin

SN - 0586-7614

IS - 3

ER -