Abstract
The reproductive number R (or R0, the initial reproductive number in an immune-naïve population) has long been successfully used to predict the likelihood of pathogen invasion, to gauge the potential severity of an epidemic, and to set policy around interventions. However, often ignored complexities have generated confusion around use of the metric. This is particularly apparent with the emergent pandemic virus SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19. We address some misconceptions about the predictive ability of the reproductive number, focusing on how it changes over time, varies over space, and relates to epidemic size by referencing the mathematical definition of R and examples from the current pandemic. We hope that a better appreciation of the uses, nuances, and limitations of R and R0 facilitates a better understanding of epidemic spread, epidemic severity, and the effects of interventions in the context of SARS-CoV-2.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2-9 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Theoretical Population Biology |
| Volume | 137 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Feb 2021 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 Elsevier Inc.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- COVID-19
- Epidemic size
- Heterogeneity
- Interventions
- R
- SARS-CoV-2
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What the reproductive number R0 can and cannot tell us about COVID-19 dynamics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS