TY - JOUR
T1 - What Predicts Support for Antler Point Restrictions?
AU - Schroeder, Susan A.
AU - Cornicelli, Louis
AU - Fulton, David C.
AU - Grund, Marrett D.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2014/7
Y1 - 2014/7
N2 - Although considerable research has focused on satisfaction with recreation experiences, limited work has examined factors related to regulatory support. In 2005, an antler point restriction (APR) regulation was introduced for hunting white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in Minnesota's Itasca State Park. Hunter surveys were conducted following the 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2009 seasons. We modeled how (a) satisfaction with the deer seen, (b) type of deer pursued, (c) agency trust, and (d) years of deer-hunting experience, influenced support for the APR, and compared the model over the four survey years. Type of deer pursued and agency trust were the strongest predictors of APR support, followed by satisfaction with deer seen, and years of hunting experience. Hunters who targeted big bucks, had more trust in the agency, and expressed more satisfaction with deer seen in the field, were more supportive of the APR. Hunters who had more deer-hunting experience were less supportive.
AB - Although considerable research has focused on satisfaction with recreation experiences, limited work has examined factors related to regulatory support. In 2005, an antler point restriction (APR) regulation was introduced for hunting white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in Minnesota's Itasca State Park. Hunter surveys were conducted following the 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2009 seasons. We modeled how (a) satisfaction with the deer seen, (b) type of deer pursued, (c) agency trust, and (d) years of deer-hunting experience, influenced support for the APR, and compared the model over the four survey years. Type of deer pursued and agency trust were the strongest predictors of APR support, followed by satisfaction with deer seen, and years of hunting experience. Hunters who targeted big bucks, had more trust in the agency, and expressed more satisfaction with deer seen in the field, were more supportive of the APR. Hunters who had more deer-hunting experience were less supportive.
KW - agency trust
KW - antler point restrictions
KW - bucks
KW - deer hunting
KW - regulations
KW - regulatory support
KW - satisfaction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904155039&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904155039&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10871209.2014.915598
DO - 10.1080/10871209.2014.915598
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84904155039
SN - 1087-1209
VL - 19
SP - 301
EP - 318
JO - Human Dimensions of Wildlife
JF - Human Dimensions of Wildlife
IS - 4
ER -