What Predicts Support for Antler Point Restrictions?

Susan A. Schroeder, Louis Cornicelli, David C. Fulton, Marrett D. Grund

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although considerable research has focused on satisfaction with recreation experiences, limited work has examined factors related to regulatory support. In 2005, an antler point restriction (APR) regulation was introduced for hunting white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in Minnesota's Itasca State Park. Hunter surveys were conducted following the 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2009 seasons. We modeled how (a) satisfaction with the deer seen, (b) type of deer pursued, (c) agency trust, and (d) years of deer-hunting experience, influenced support for the APR, and compared the model over the four survey years. Type of deer pursued and agency trust were the strongest predictors of APR support, followed by satisfaction with deer seen, and years of hunting experience. Hunters who targeted big bucks, had more trust in the agency, and expressed more satisfaction with deer seen in the field, were more supportive of the APR. Hunters who had more deer-hunting experience were less supportive.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)301-318
Number of pages18
JournalHuman Dimensions of Wildlife
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2014

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • agency trust
  • antler point restrictions
  • bucks
  • deer hunting
  • regulations
  • regulatory support
  • satisfaction

Cite this