What Predicts Support for Antler Point Restrictions?

Susan A. Schroeder, Louis Cornicelli, David C. Fulton, Marrett D. Grund

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations


Although considerable research has focused on satisfaction with recreation experiences, limited work has examined factors related to regulatory support. In 2005, an antler point restriction (APR) regulation was introduced for hunting white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in Minnesota's Itasca State Park. Hunter surveys were conducted following the 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2009 seasons. We modeled how (a) satisfaction with the deer seen, (b) type of deer pursued, (c) agency trust, and (d) years of deer-hunting experience, influenced support for the APR, and compared the model over the four survey years. Type of deer pursued and agency trust were the strongest predictors of APR support, followed by satisfaction with deer seen, and years of hunting experience. Hunters who targeted big bucks, had more trust in the agency, and expressed more satisfaction with deer seen in the field, were more supportive of the APR. Hunters who had more deer-hunting experience were less supportive.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)301-318
Number of pages18
JournalHuman Dimensions of Wildlife
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 2014

Bibliographical note

Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.


  • agency trust
  • antler point restrictions
  • bucks
  • deer hunting
  • regulations
  • regulatory support
  • satisfaction


Dive into the research topics of 'What Predicts Support for Antler Point Restrictions?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this