What Makes Queer Oral History Different

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

This essay asks whether queer oral history is different in light of recent interventions in queer theory, LGBTQ history, and oral history. It explores the intellectual genealogy of queer oral history in the research projects of some of its early practitioners. It also provides a close reading of Alessandro Portelli's classic essay and considers its implications for a queer methodology, drawing from the work of recent scholarship in queer studies as well as our collaborative research in the Twin Cities Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender Oral History Project. Finally, it gestures towards some of the unique dimensions of a queer methodology and its rich potential for research in LGBTQ oral history.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-24
Number of pages24
JournalOral History Review
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Oral History Association. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • LGBTQ history
  • performance
  • queer methodologies
  • queer studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What Makes Queer Oral History Different'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this