What makes a representative user representative? A participatory poster

Michael Muller, David R. Miilen, Carol Strohecker

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

We compare six definitions of the concept of "representative user," including interpretations based in statistics, grounded theory, political theory and design practice. This participatory poster invites conference participants to contribute their own interpretations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCHI'01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA'01
Pages101-102
Number of pages2
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2001
EventConference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2001 - Seattle, WA, United States
Duration: Mar 31 2001Apr 5 2001

Other

OtherConference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2001
CountryUnited States
CitySeattle, WA
Period3/31/014/5/01

Keywords

  • Field studies
  • Participatory design
  • Representations
  • Requirements analysis
  • Task analysis
  • Work analysis

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'What makes a representative user representative? A participatory poster'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Muller, M., Miilen, D. R., & Strohecker, C. (2001). What makes a representative user representative? A participatory poster. In CHI'01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA'01 (pp. 101-102) https://doi.org/10.1145/634067.634129