What is the War on Terror? Framing through the eyes of journalists

Seth C. Lewis, Stephen D. Reese

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study explored the War on Terror framing process through interviews with journalists at USA Today, testing the presumption that, because frames are organizing principles whose manifestations extend beyond the level of content alone, journalists' personal discourse will reflect and reinforce frames found in the text. Results show that reporters "transmitted" the War on Terror as shorthand for policy, "reified" the frame as concrete and uncontested, and "naturalized" it as a taken-forgranted condition. These findings suggest broader lessons for the U.S. press in becoming more aware of the words and catchphrases that signify the prevailing wisdom of public officials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)85-102
Number of pages18
JournalJournalism and Mass Communication Quarterly
Volume86
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint

journalist
terrorism
Concretes
reporter
Testing
wisdom
discourse
interview

Cite this

What is the War on Terror? Framing through the eyes of journalists. / Lewis, Seth C.; Reese, Stephen D.

In: Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, Vol. 86, No. 1, 01.01.2009, p. 85-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lewis, Seth C. ; Reese, Stephen D. / What is the War on Terror? Framing through the eyes of journalists. In: Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 2009 ; Vol. 86, No. 1. pp. 85-102.
@article{780a45bb17654fe79ba1ed6ad91f11af,
title = "What is the War on Terror? Framing through the eyes of journalists",
abstract = "This study explored the War on Terror framing process through interviews with journalists at USA Today, testing the presumption that, because frames are organizing principles whose manifestations extend beyond the level of content alone, journalists' personal discourse will reflect and reinforce frames found in the text. Results show that reporters {"}transmitted{"} the War on Terror as shorthand for policy, {"}reified{"} the frame as concrete and uncontested, and {"}naturalized{"} it as a taken-forgranted condition. These findings suggest broader lessons for the U.S. press in becoming more aware of the words and catchphrases that signify the prevailing wisdom of public officials.",
author = "Lewis, {Seth C.} and Reese, {Stephen D.}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/107769900908600106",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "85--102",
journal = "Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly",
issn = "1077-6990",
publisher = "Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is the War on Terror? Framing through the eyes of journalists

AU - Lewis, Seth C.

AU - Reese, Stephen D.

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - This study explored the War on Terror framing process through interviews with journalists at USA Today, testing the presumption that, because frames are organizing principles whose manifestations extend beyond the level of content alone, journalists' personal discourse will reflect and reinforce frames found in the text. Results show that reporters "transmitted" the War on Terror as shorthand for policy, "reified" the frame as concrete and uncontested, and "naturalized" it as a taken-forgranted condition. These findings suggest broader lessons for the U.S. press in becoming more aware of the words and catchphrases that signify the prevailing wisdom of public officials.

AB - This study explored the War on Terror framing process through interviews with journalists at USA Today, testing the presumption that, because frames are organizing principles whose manifestations extend beyond the level of content alone, journalists' personal discourse will reflect and reinforce frames found in the text. Results show that reporters "transmitted" the War on Terror as shorthand for policy, "reified" the frame as concrete and uncontested, and "naturalized" it as a taken-forgranted condition. These findings suggest broader lessons for the U.S. press in becoming more aware of the words and catchphrases that signify the prevailing wisdom of public officials.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67749139872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67749139872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/107769900908600106

DO - 10.1177/107769900908600106

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:67749139872

VL - 86

SP - 85

EP - 102

JO - Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly

JF - Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly

SN - 1077-6990

IS - 1

ER -