TY - JOUR
T1 - What is conservation paleobiology? Tracking 20 years of research and development
AU - Dillon, Erin M.
AU - Pier, Jaleigh Q.
AU - Smith, Jansen A.
AU - Raja, Nussaïbah B.
AU - Dimitrijević, Danijela
AU - Austin, Elizabeth L.
AU - Cybulski, Jonathan D.
AU - De Entrambasaguas, Julia
AU - Durham, Stephen R.
AU - Grether, Carolin M.
AU - Haldar, Himadri Sekhar
AU - Kocáková, Kristína
AU - Lin, Chien Hsiang
AU - Mazzini, Ilaria
AU - Mychajliw, Alexis M.
AU - Ollendorf, Amy L.
AU - Pimiento, Catalina
AU - Regalado Fernández, Omar R.
AU - Smith, Isaiah E.
AU - Dietl, Gregory P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Dillon, Pier, Smith, Raja, Dimitrijević, Austin, Cybulski, De Entrambasaguas, Durham, Grether, Haldar, Kocáková, Lin, Mazzini, Mychajliw, Ollendorf, Pimiento, Regalado Fernández, Smith and Dietl.
PY - 2022/12/7
Y1 - 2022/12/7
N2 - Conservation paleobiology has coalesced over the last two decades since its formal coining, united by the goal of applying geohistorical records to inform the conservation, management, and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Yet, the field is still attempting to form an identity distinct from its academic roots. Here, we ask a deceptively simple question: What is conservation paleobiology? To track its development as a field, we synthesize complementary perspectives from a survey of the scientific community that is familiar with conservation paleobiology and a systematic literature review of publications that use the term. We present an overview of conservation paleobiology’s research scope and compare survey participants’ perceptions of what it is and what it should be as a field. We find that conservation paleobiologists use a variety of geohistorical data in their work, although research is typified by near-time records of marine molluscs and terrestrial mammals collected over local to regional spatial scales. Our results also confirm the field’s broad disciplinary basis: survey participants indicated that conservation paleobiology can incorporate information from a wide range of disciplines spanning conservation biology, ecology, historical ecology, paleontology, and archaeology. Finally, we show that conservation paleobiologists have yet to reach a consensus on how applied the field should be in practice. The survey revealed that many participants thought the field should be more applied but that most do not currently engage with conservation practice. Reflecting on how conservation paleobiology has developed over the last two decades, we discuss opportunities to promote community cohesion, strengthen collaborations within conservation science, and align training priorities with the field’s identity as it continues to crystallize.
AB - Conservation paleobiology has coalesced over the last two decades since its formal coining, united by the goal of applying geohistorical records to inform the conservation, management, and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Yet, the field is still attempting to form an identity distinct from its academic roots. Here, we ask a deceptively simple question: What is conservation paleobiology? To track its development as a field, we synthesize complementary perspectives from a survey of the scientific community that is familiar with conservation paleobiology and a systematic literature review of publications that use the term. We present an overview of conservation paleobiology’s research scope and compare survey participants’ perceptions of what it is and what it should be as a field. We find that conservation paleobiologists use a variety of geohistorical data in their work, although research is typified by near-time records of marine molluscs and terrestrial mammals collected over local to regional spatial scales. Our results also confirm the field’s broad disciplinary basis: survey participants indicated that conservation paleobiology can incorporate information from a wide range of disciplines spanning conservation biology, ecology, historical ecology, paleontology, and archaeology. Finally, we show that conservation paleobiologists have yet to reach a consensus on how applied the field should be in practice. The survey revealed that many participants thought the field should be more applied but that most do not currently engage with conservation practice. Reflecting on how conservation paleobiology has developed over the last two decades, we discuss opportunities to promote community cohesion, strengthen collaborations within conservation science, and align training priorities with the field’s identity as it continues to crystallize.
KW - conservation paleobiology
KW - conservation science
KW - cross-disciplinarity
KW - geohistorical records
KW - survey
KW - systematic literature review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144250580&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85144250580&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fevo.2022.1031483
DO - 10.3389/fevo.2022.1031483
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85144250580
SN - 2296-701X
VL - 10
JO - Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
JF - Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
M1 - 1031483
ER -