What Does It Mean to "Employ" the RE-AIM Model?

Rodger S. Kessler, E. Peyton Purcell, Russell E. Glasgow, Lisa M. Klesges, Rachel M. Benkeser, Charles J Peek

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

95 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many grant proposals identify the use of a given evaluation model or framework but offer little about how such models are implemented. The authors discuss what it means to employ a specific model, RE-AIM, and key dimensions from this model for program planning, implementation, evaluation, and reporting. The authors report both conceptual and content specifications for the use of the RE-AIM model and a content review of 42 recent dissemination and implementation grant applications to National Institutes of Health that proposed the use of this model. Outcomes include the extent to which proposals addressed the overall RE-AIM model and specific items within the five dimensions in their methods or evaluation plans. The majority of grants used only some elements of the model (less than 10% contained thorough measures across all RE-AIM dimensions). Few met criteria for "fully developed use" of RE-AIM and the percentage of key issues addressed varied from, on average, 45% to 78% across the RE-AIM dimensions. The results and discussion of key criteria should help investigators in their use of RE-AIM and illuminate the broader issue of comprehensive use of evaluation models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)44-66
Number of pages23
JournalEvaluation and the Health Professions
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 12 2013

Fingerprint

Organized Financing
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • RE-AIM
  • evaluation
  • fidelity
  • methodology
  • model testing
  • review criteria

Cite this

Kessler, R. S., Purcell, E. P., Glasgow, R. E., Klesges, L. M., Benkeser, R. M., & Peek, C. J. (2013). What Does It Mean to "Employ" the RE-AIM Model? Evaluation and the Health Professions, 36(1), 44-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278712446066

What Does It Mean to "Employ" the RE-AIM Model? / Kessler, Rodger S.; Purcell, E. Peyton; Glasgow, Russell E.; Klesges, Lisa M.; Benkeser, Rachel M.; Peek, Charles J.

In: Evaluation and the Health Professions, Vol. 36, No. 1, 12.02.2013, p. 44-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Kessler, RS, Purcell, EP, Glasgow, RE, Klesges, LM, Benkeser, RM & Peek, CJ 2013, 'What Does It Mean to "Employ" the RE-AIM Model?', Evaluation and the Health Professions, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 44-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278712446066
Kessler RS, Purcell EP, Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Benkeser RM, Peek CJ. What Does It Mean to "Employ" the RE-AIM Model? Evaluation and the Health Professions. 2013 Feb 12;36(1):44-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278712446066
Kessler, Rodger S. ; Purcell, E. Peyton ; Glasgow, Russell E. ; Klesges, Lisa M. ; Benkeser, Rachel M. ; Peek, Charles J. / What Does It Mean to "Employ" the RE-AIM Model?. In: Evaluation and the Health Professions. 2013 ; Vol. 36, No. 1. pp. 44-66.
@article{d8aeafd1848c43538ba52a836e8bf9fc,
title = "What Does It Mean to {"}Employ{"} the RE-AIM Model?",
abstract = "Many grant proposals identify the use of a given evaluation model or framework but offer little about how such models are implemented. The authors discuss what it means to employ a specific model, RE-AIM, and key dimensions from this model for program planning, implementation, evaluation, and reporting. The authors report both conceptual and content specifications for the use of the RE-AIM model and a content review of 42 recent dissemination and implementation grant applications to National Institutes of Health that proposed the use of this model. Outcomes include the extent to which proposals addressed the overall RE-AIM model and specific items within the five dimensions in their methods or evaluation plans. The majority of grants used only some elements of the model (less than 10{\%} contained thorough measures across all RE-AIM dimensions). Few met criteria for {"}fully developed use{"} of RE-AIM and the percentage of key issues addressed varied from, on average, 45{\%} to 78{\%} across the RE-AIM dimensions. The results and discussion of key criteria should help investigators in their use of RE-AIM and illuminate the broader issue of comprehensive use of evaluation models.",
keywords = "RE-AIM, evaluation, fidelity, methodology, model testing, review criteria",
author = "Kessler, {Rodger S.} and Purcell, {E. Peyton} and Glasgow, {Russell E.} and Klesges, {Lisa M.} and Benkeser, {Rachel M.} and Peek, {Charles J}",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1177/0163278712446066",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "44--66",
journal = "Evaluation and the Health Professions",
issn = "0163-2787",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What Does It Mean to "Employ" the RE-AIM Model?

AU - Kessler, Rodger S.

AU - Purcell, E. Peyton

AU - Glasgow, Russell E.

AU - Klesges, Lisa M.

AU - Benkeser, Rachel M.

AU - Peek, Charles J

PY - 2013/2/12

Y1 - 2013/2/12

N2 - Many grant proposals identify the use of a given evaluation model or framework but offer little about how such models are implemented. The authors discuss what it means to employ a specific model, RE-AIM, and key dimensions from this model for program planning, implementation, evaluation, and reporting. The authors report both conceptual and content specifications for the use of the RE-AIM model and a content review of 42 recent dissemination and implementation grant applications to National Institutes of Health that proposed the use of this model. Outcomes include the extent to which proposals addressed the overall RE-AIM model and specific items within the five dimensions in their methods or evaluation plans. The majority of grants used only some elements of the model (less than 10% contained thorough measures across all RE-AIM dimensions). Few met criteria for "fully developed use" of RE-AIM and the percentage of key issues addressed varied from, on average, 45% to 78% across the RE-AIM dimensions. The results and discussion of key criteria should help investigators in their use of RE-AIM and illuminate the broader issue of comprehensive use of evaluation models.

AB - Many grant proposals identify the use of a given evaluation model or framework but offer little about how such models are implemented. The authors discuss what it means to employ a specific model, RE-AIM, and key dimensions from this model for program planning, implementation, evaluation, and reporting. The authors report both conceptual and content specifications for the use of the RE-AIM model and a content review of 42 recent dissemination and implementation grant applications to National Institutes of Health that proposed the use of this model. Outcomes include the extent to which proposals addressed the overall RE-AIM model and specific items within the five dimensions in their methods or evaluation plans. The majority of grants used only some elements of the model (less than 10% contained thorough measures across all RE-AIM dimensions). Few met criteria for "fully developed use" of RE-AIM and the percentage of key issues addressed varied from, on average, 45% to 78% across the RE-AIM dimensions. The results and discussion of key criteria should help investigators in their use of RE-AIM and illuminate the broader issue of comprehensive use of evaluation models.

KW - RE-AIM

KW - evaluation

KW - fidelity

KW - methodology

KW - model testing

KW - review criteria

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873442890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873442890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0163278712446066

DO - 10.1177/0163278712446066

M3 - Review article

C2 - 22615498

AN - SCOPUS:84873442890

VL - 36

SP - 44

EP - 66

JO - Evaluation and the Health Professions

JF - Evaluation and the Health Professions

SN - 0163-2787

IS - 1

ER -