Waterfowl use of dense nesting cover in the Canadian Parklands

Todd W. Arnold, Lea M. Craig-Moore, Llwellyn M. Armstrong, David W. Howerter, James H. Devries, Brian L. Joynt, Robert B. Emery, Michael G. Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

51 Scopus citations


Dense nesting cover (DNC) has been a conspicuous component of habitat management for upland-nesting ducks for >30 years, but its benefits for nesting ducks have been contentious. During 1994-1999 we monitored 3,058 dabbling duck (Anas spp.) nests in 84 DNC fields located throughout the Canadian Parklands to examine sources of among-field variation in nest density and nesting success. Nest density averaged 1.51 (SE = 0.15) nests/ha and overall nesting success was 20.4%, but there was pronounced annual variation in both estimates. Nesting success increased with increasing field size (range = 6-111 ha), but nest density remained constant. Nest density increased with percent wetland habitat within DNC fields and declined with percent perennial cover in the surrounding 2.4 x 2.4-km landscape, but these variables were not important for predicting nesting success. Nest abundance and nesting success roughly doubled in fields seeded with alfalfa (Medicago sativa) or sweet clovers (Melilotus spp.), but there was no benefit from using native as opposed to tame grasses. We recommend that waterfowl managers in the Canadian Parklands establish DNC with alfalfa in large fields in landscapes with abundant wetlands but minimal competing cover.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2542-2549
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Wildlife Management
Issue number8
StatePublished - Nov 2007


  • Anas spp.
  • Canadian Parklands
  • Dabbling ducks
  • Dense nesting cover (DNC)
  • Nest density
  • Nesting success
  • Prairie habitat joint venture
  • Prairie pothole region


Dive into the research topics of 'Waterfowl use of dense nesting cover in the Canadian Parklands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this