Walking and talking the tree of life: Why and how to teach about biodiversity

Cissy Ballen, Harry W. Greene

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Taxonomic details of diversity are an essential scaffolding for biology education, yet outdated methods for teaching the tree of life (TOL), as implied by textbook content and usage, are still commonly employed. Here, we show that the traditional approach only vaguely represents evolutionary relationships, fails to denote major events in the history of life, and relies heavily on memorizing near-meaningless taxonomic ranks. Conversely, a clade-based strategy—focused on common ancestry, monophyletic groups, and derived functional traits—is explicitly based on Darwin’s “descent with modification,” provides students with a rational system for organizing the details of biodiversity, and readily lends itself to active learning techniques. We advocate for a phylogenetic classification that mirrors the TOL, a pedagogical format of increasingly complex but always hierarchical presentations, and the adoption of active learning technologies and tactics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere2001630
JournalPLoS Biology
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 20 2017

Fingerprint

Biodiversity
walking
Walking
Problem-Based Learning
learning
biodiversity
educational methods
Textbooks
education
Teaching
students
ancestry
Education
life history
Students
taxonomy
Biological Sciences
phylogeny
History
Technology

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Cite this

Walking and talking the tree of life : Why and how to teach about biodiversity. / Ballen, Cissy; Greene, Harry W.

In: PLoS Biology, Vol. 15, No. 3, e2001630, 20.03.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ballen, Cissy ; Greene, Harry W. / Walking and talking the tree of life : Why and how to teach about biodiversity. In: PLoS Biology. 2017 ; Vol. 15, No. 3.
@article{2586602be70a4fb7839d0b026a18cc68,
title = "Walking and talking the tree of life: Why and how to teach about biodiversity",
abstract = "Taxonomic details of diversity are an essential scaffolding for biology education, yet outdated methods for teaching the tree of life (TOL), as implied by textbook content and usage, are still commonly employed. Here, we show that the traditional approach only vaguely represents evolutionary relationships, fails to denote major events in the history of life, and relies heavily on memorizing near-meaningless taxonomic ranks. Conversely, a clade-based strategy—focused on common ancestry, monophyletic groups, and derived functional traits—is explicitly based on Darwin’s “descent with modification,” provides students with a rational system for organizing the details of biodiversity, and readily lends itself to active learning techniques. We advocate for a phylogenetic classification that mirrors the TOL, a pedagogical format of increasingly complex but always hierarchical presentations, and the adoption of active learning technologies and tactics.",
author = "Cissy Ballen and Greene, {Harry W.}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pbio.2001630",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
journal = "PLoS Biology",
issn = "1544-9173",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Walking and talking the tree of life

T2 - Why and how to teach about biodiversity

AU - Ballen, Cissy

AU - Greene, Harry W.

PY - 2017/3/20

Y1 - 2017/3/20

N2 - Taxonomic details of diversity are an essential scaffolding for biology education, yet outdated methods for teaching the tree of life (TOL), as implied by textbook content and usage, are still commonly employed. Here, we show that the traditional approach only vaguely represents evolutionary relationships, fails to denote major events in the history of life, and relies heavily on memorizing near-meaningless taxonomic ranks. Conversely, a clade-based strategy—focused on common ancestry, monophyletic groups, and derived functional traits—is explicitly based on Darwin’s “descent with modification,” provides students with a rational system for organizing the details of biodiversity, and readily lends itself to active learning techniques. We advocate for a phylogenetic classification that mirrors the TOL, a pedagogical format of increasingly complex but always hierarchical presentations, and the adoption of active learning technologies and tactics.

AB - Taxonomic details of diversity are an essential scaffolding for biology education, yet outdated methods for teaching the tree of life (TOL), as implied by textbook content and usage, are still commonly employed. Here, we show that the traditional approach only vaguely represents evolutionary relationships, fails to denote major events in the history of life, and relies heavily on memorizing near-meaningless taxonomic ranks. Conversely, a clade-based strategy—focused on common ancestry, monophyletic groups, and derived functional traits—is explicitly based on Darwin’s “descent with modification,” provides students with a rational system for organizing the details of biodiversity, and readily lends itself to active learning techniques. We advocate for a phylogenetic classification that mirrors the TOL, a pedagogical format of increasingly complex but always hierarchical presentations, and the adoption of active learning technologies and tactics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016990597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016990597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001630

DO - 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001630

M3 - Article

VL - 15

JO - PLoS Biology

JF - PLoS Biology

SN - 1544-9173

IS - 3

M1 - e2001630

ER -