Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Experts@Minnesota Home
Home
Profiles
Research units
University Assets
Projects and Grants
Research output
Datasets
Press/Media
Activities
Fellowships, Honors, and Prizes
Impacts
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Volumetric tumor response assessment is inefficient without overt clinical benefit compared to conventional, manual veterinary response assessment in canine nasal tumors
Esther Nell
, Christopher Ober
,
Aaron Rendahl
, Lisa Forrest
,
Jessica Lawrence
Veterinary Clinical Sciences
Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences
Cellular Mechanisms of Cancer
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
8
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Volumetric tumor response assessment is inefficient without overt clinical benefit compared to conventional, manual veterinary response assessment in canine nasal tumors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Veterinary
100%
Clinical Benefit
100%
Response Assessment
100%
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
100%
Tumor Response Assessment
100%
Canine Nasal Tumors
100%
Tumor Volume
60%
Clinical Characteristics
40%
Nasal Tumor
40%
Interobserver Agreement
40%
Progression-free Interval
40%
Tumor Measurement
40%
Contour Method
40%
Oncology Patients
20%
Computed Tomography
20%
Radiation Therapy
20%
Skull
20%
Tumor Response
20%
Serial Measurements
20%
Response to Therapy
20%
Volume Change
20%
Radiologists
20%
Strong Correlation
20%
Rapid Methods
20%
Accurate Assessment
20%
Semi-automated
20%
Interobserver Variability
20%
Linear Method
20%
Volume Estimation
20%
Characteristics Measurement
20%
Veterinary Oncology
20%
Measurement Characteristics
20%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine
Canis
100%
Neoplasm
100%
Tumor
100%
Dog
11%
Veterinary Oncology
11%