Visual short-term memory for two sequential arrays: One integrated representation or two separate representations?

Yuhong Jiang, Arjun Kumar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two dot arrays, each containing a different set of six randomly selected locations from a 5 × 5 matrix, were presented briefly and were separated by an interstimulus interval (ISI) of 0, 200, 500, or 1,500 msec. Subjects were asked to remember these locations and to report whether a probe dot matched the locations in memory. To find out whether the subjects had formed an integrated representation of the two arrays, the probe dot was accompanied by matrix elements from the first array, from the second array, or from both arrays. Memory for Array 1 was significantly impaired when the retrieval context was drawn from Array 2, and vice versa, suggesting that the two arrays were represented separately. This effect was observed only at an ISI of 500 msec or longer. We propose that as Array 1 is better consolidated, its representation becomes more separated from that of Array 2.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)495-500
Number of pages6
JournalPsychonomic Bulletin and Review
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Visual Short-term Memory

Cite this

Visual short-term memory for two sequential arrays : One integrated representation or two separate representations? / Jiang, Yuhong; Kumar, Arjun.

In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Vol. 11, No. 3, 01.01.2004, p. 495-500.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7ac75dba4ec546728f58050297827141,
title = "Visual short-term memory for two sequential arrays: One integrated representation or two separate representations?",
abstract = "Two dot arrays, each containing a different set of six randomly selected locations from a 5 × 5 matrix, were presented briefly and were separated by an interstimulus interval (ISI) of 0, 200, 500, or 1,500 msec. Subjects were asked to remember these locations and to report whether a probe dot matched the locations in memory. To find out whether the subjects had formed an integrated representation of the two arrays, the probe dot was accompanied by matrix elements from the first array, from the second array, or from both arrays. Memory for Array 1 was significantly impaired when the retrieval context was drawn from Array 2, and vice versa, suggesting that the two arrays were represented separately. This effect was observed only at an ISI of 500 msec or longer. We propose that as Array 1 is better consolidated, its representation becomes more separated from that of Array 2.",
author = "Yuhong Jiang and Arjun Kumar",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/BF03196601",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "495--500",
journal = "Psychonomic Bulletin and Review",
issn = "1069-9384",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visual short-term memory for two sequential arrays

T2 - One integrated representation or two separate representations?

AU - Jiang, Yuhong

AU - Kumar, Arjun

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - Two dot arrays, each containing a different set of six randomly selected locations from a 5 × 5 matrix, were presented briefly and were separated by an interstimulus interval (ISI) of 0, 200, 500, or 1,500 msec. Subjects were asked to remember these locations and to report whether a probe dot matched the locations in memory. To find out whether the subjects had formed an integrated representation of the two arrays, the probe dot was accompanied by matrix elements from the first array, from the second array, or from both arrays. Memory for Array 1 was significantly impaired when the retrieval context was drawn from Array 2, and vice versa, suggesting that the two arrays were represented separately. This effect was observed only at an ISI of 500 msec or longer. We propose that as Array 1 is better consolidated, its representation becomes more separated from that of Array 2.

AB - Two dot arrays, each containing a different set of six randomly selected locations from a 5 × 5 matrix, were presented briefly and were separated by an interstimulus interval (ISI) of 0, 200, 500, or 1,500 msec. Subjects were asked to remember these locations and to report whether a probe dot matched the locations in memory. To find out whether the subjects had formed an integrated representation of the two arrays, the probe dot was accompanied by matrix elements from the first array, from the second array, or from both arrays. Memory for Array 1 was significantly impaired when the retrieval context was drawn from Array 2, and vice versa, suggesting that the two arrays were represented separately. This effect was observed only at an ISI of 500 msec or longer. We propose that as Array 1 is better consolidated, its representation becomes more separated from that of Array 2.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4544330285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4544330285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03196601

DO - 10.3758/BF03196601

M3 - Article

C2 - 15376801

AN - SCOPUS:4544330285

VL - 11

SP - 495

EP - 500

JO - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

JF - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

SN - 1069-9384

IS - 3

ER -