Vigilance as a Practice of Postcolonial Freedom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The notion that popular vigilance is central to safe-guarding democratic freedoms is a key pillar of republican political thought. Yet, this conception does not translate well to postcolonial contexts without some reconceptualization. In this article, I take up the ways in which two African statesmen and political theorists, Julius Nyerere and Thomas Sankara, reconceptualize the practice of vigilance in the postcolonial context. Both theorists demonstrate that the collective exercise of vigilance is a qualitatively different political practice in the postcolonial context because citizens must simultaneously target internal domination from elites and external domination from international institutions and former colonial powers. Furthermore, they underscore that a shared political vision in the form of a national ethic is crucial for generating and guiding mass practices of vigilance. Doing so, Nyerere and Sankara articulate a distinct tradition of postcolonial republicanism that better conceptualizes the challenges of stabilizing state–society relations in postcolonial Africa.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1614-1627
Number of pages14
JournalAmerican Political Science Review
Volume118
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2023.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Vigilance as a Practice of Postcolonial Freedom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this