Abstract
We compare different neural network architectures for machine learning algorithms designed to identify the neutrino interaction vertex position in the MINERvA detector. The architectures developed and optimized by hand are compared with the architectures developed in an automated way using the package “Multi-node Evolutionary Neural Networks for Deep Learning” (MENNDL), developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. While the domain-expert hand-tuned network was the best performer, the differences were negligible and the auto-generated networks performed as well. There is always a trade-off between human, and computer resources for network optimization and this work suggests that automated optimization, assuming resources are available, provides a compelling way to save significant expert time.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | T08013 |
Journal | Journal of Instrumentation |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 8 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 1 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022 IOP Publishing Ltd and Sissa Medialab.
Keywords
- Analysis and statistical methods
- Data processing methods
- Simulation methods and programs
- Software architectures (event data models, frameworks and databases)