Vegetation trajectories of restored agricultural wetlands following sediment removal

Sarah G. Winikoff, Daniel J. Larkin, Shana L. Meier, Jacques C. Finlay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations


Recognition of wetland ecosystem services has led to substantial investment in wetland restoration in recent decades. Wetland restorations can be designed to meet numerous goals, among which reestablishing a diverse native wetland plant community is a common aim. In agricultural areas, where previously drained wetland basins can fill with eroded sediment from the surrounding landscape, restoration often includes excavation to expose buried seed banks. The extent to which excavation improves the diversity of wetland plant communities is unclear, particularly in terms of longer-term outcomes. We examined plant species diversity and community composition in 24 restored agricultural wetlands across west-central Minnesota, U.S.A. In all study wetlands, hydrology was restored by removing subsurface drainage and plugging drainage ditches, thus reestablishing groundwater connectivity and hydroperiod (“business as usual” treatment). In half of the wetlands, accumulated sediment was removed from the basin and redeposited on the surrounding landscape (“excavated” treatment). Initially, sediment removal significantly decreased invasive species cover, particularly of hybrid cattail (Typha × glauca) and reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea), and increased community diversity and evenness. Over time, the effects of sediment removal diminished, and eventually disappeared by approximately 6 years after restoration. While our results demonstrate that sediment removal improves initial restoration outcomes for plant communities, longer-term benefits require sustained management, such as invasive species control or resetting of basins through additional excavation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)612-622
Number of pages11
JournalRestoration Ecology
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 1 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Primary funding was provided by the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund as recommended by the Legislative‐Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources. Additional funding was provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Science to Achieve Results (STAR) Graduate Fellowship Program. EPA has not officially endorsed this publication and the views expressed herein may not reflect the views of the EPA. This project was made possible by collaboration with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Minnesota Private Lands Office and biologists, and the private land owners who granted access to their properties and restored previously drained wetlands. We thank C. Glowac who assisted in vegetation surveys; S. Galatowitsch, J. Bohnen, and E. Seabloom who provided ideas and support during project design.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Society for Ecological Restoration

Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.


  • Phalaris arundinacea
  • Typha × glauca
  • agricultural wetland
  • community
  • diversity
  • sediment

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Vegetation trajectories of restored agricultural wetlands following sediment removal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this