Vegetation responses to interglacial warming in the Arctic: Examples from Lake El'gygytgyn, Far East Russian Arctic

A. V. Lozhkin, P. M. Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations


Preliminary analyses of Lake El'gygytgyn sediment indicate a wide range of ecosystem responses to warmer than present climates. While palynological work describing all interglacial vegetation is ongoing, sufficient data exist to compare recent warm events (the postglacial thermal maximum, PGTM, and marine isotope stage, MIS5) with "super" interglaciations (MIS11, MIS31). Palynological assemblages associated with these climatic optima suggest two types of vegetation responses: one dominated by deciduous taxa (PGTM, MIS5) and the second by evergreen conifers (MIS11, MIS31). MIS11 forests show a similarity to modern Picea-Larix-Betula-Alnus forests of Siberia. While dark coniferous forest also characterizes MIS31, the pollen taxa show an affinity to the boreal forest of the lower Amur valley (southern Russian Far East). Despite vegetation differences during these thermal maxima, all glacial-interglacial transitions are alike, being dominated by deciduous woody taxa. Initially Betula shrub tundra established and was replaced by tundra with tree-sized shrubs (PGTM), Betula woodland (MIS5), or Betula-Larix (MIS11, MIS31) forest. The consistent occurrence of deciduous forest and/or high shrub tundra before the incidence of maximum warmth underscores the importance of this biome for modeling efforts. The El'gygytgyn data also suggest a possible elimination or massive reduction of Arctic plant communities under extreme warm-earth scenarios.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1211-1219
Number of pages9
JournalClimate of the Past
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2013

Bibliographical note

Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.


Dive into the research topics of 'Vegetation responses to interglacial warming in the Arctic: Examples from Lake El'gygytgyn, Far East Russian Arctic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this