Variations in Product Choices of Frequently Purchased Herbs: Caveat Emptor

Judith Garrard, Susan L Harms, Lynn E Eberly, Amy Matiak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

63 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Patients who report use of herbs to their physicians may not be able to accurately describe the ingredients or recommended dosage because the products for the same herb may differ. The purpose of this study was to describe variations in label information of products for each of the 10 most commonly purchased herbs. Methods: Products for each of 10 herbs were surveyed in a convenience sample of 20 retail stores in a large metropolitan area. Herbs were those with the greatest sales dollars in 1998: echinacea, St John's wort, Ginkgo biloba, garlic, saw palmetto, ginseng, goldenseal, aloe, Siberian ginseng, and valerian. Results: Each herb had a large range in label ingredients and recommended daily dose (RDD) across available products. Strengths were not directly comparable because of ingredient variability. Among 880 products, 43% were consistent with a benchmark in ingredients and RDD, 20% in ingredients only, and 37% were either not consistent or label information was insufficient. Price per RDD was a significant predictor of consistency with the benchmark, but store type was not. Conclusions: Persons self-medicating with an herb may be ingesting ingredients substantially different from that recommended by a benchmark, both in quantity and content. Higher price per label RDD was the best predictor of consistency with a benchmark. This study demonstrates that health providers and consumers need to closely examine label ingredients of presumably the same or similar herbal products.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2290-2295
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Internal Medicine
Volume163
Issue number19
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 27 2003

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Variations in Product Choices of Frequently Purchased Herbs: Caveat Emptor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this