Vancomycin plus imipenem, ceftazidime or ciprofloxacin in second line therapy in patients with febrile neutropenia not responding to first line therapy

J. Lacka, E. Oravcova, L. Sevcikova, M. Studena, V. Bachanova, E. Kukuckova, S. Spanik, J. Sufliarsky, L. Helpianska, J. Trupl, A. Kunova, I. Vochyanova, Z. Sycova, E. Grey, V. Krčméry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

137 patients with febrile neutropenia after cytotoxic therapy not responding to ceftazidime plus amikacin or ceftriaxone plus netilmicin received additionally to the previous combination either vancomycin alone or combined with another anti-gram-negative compound: imipenem in those treated prophylactically with ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin in those without prophylaxis. The addition of vancomycin to the previously ineffective combination of a third generation cephalosporin plus aminoglycoside, and replacement of ceftriaxone plus netilmicin with ceftazidime plus amikacin plus vancomycin or with ceftazidime plus vancomycin seems to be less effective (71.8-75 vs. 87.5-90.9%, p < 0.02) and more toxic (20.5-47.2 vs. 0-5%, p < 0.0005) than vancomycin in combination with a different anti-gram-negative compound as previously used: imipenem or ciprofloxacin.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)146-149
Number of pages4
JournalChemotherapy
Volume42
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

Bibliographical note

Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Ceftazidime Imipenem
  • Ciprofloxacin
  • Febrile neutropenia
  • Vancomycin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Vancomycin plus imipenem, ceftazidime or ciprofloxacin in second line therapy in patients with febrile neutropenia not responding to first line therapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this