Value of IS research-a response to the Rejoinders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article responds to six rejoinders to Hassan [2014] and addresses their concerns surrounding the anxiety discourse in Information Systems (IS), the need to meet or exceed stakeholder expectations, the notion of originality and what it means to IS researchers, the nature of the "core" of IS research, and different strategies in establishing an academic discipline. This response argues for a focus on internal efforts to put our house in order ahead of reputational maneuverings, and proposes a closer examination of our intellectual structures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number48
Pages (from-to)857-864
Number of pages8
JournalCommunications of the Association for Information Systems
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Keywords

  • IS knowledge
  • Impact of research
  • Relevance
  • Research benefits
  • Value of research

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Value of IS research-a response to the Rejoinders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this