TY - JOUR
T1 - Value for Correction
T2 - Documenting Perceptions about Peer Correction of Misinformation on Social Media in the Context of COVID-19
AU - Bode, Leticia
AU - Vraga, Emily
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Although correction is often suggested as a tool against misinformation, and empirical research suggests it can be an effective one, we know little about how people perceive the act of correcting people on social media. This study measures such perceptions in the context of the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, introducing the concept of value for correction. We find that value for correction on social media is relatively strong and widespread, with no differences by partisanship or gender. Neither those who engage in correction themselves nor those witnessing the correction of others have higher value for correction. Witnessing correction, on the other hand, is associated with lower concerns about negative consequences of correction, whereas engaging in correction is not.
AB - Although correction is often suggested as a tool against misinformation, and empirical research suggests it can be an effective one, we know little about how people perceive the act of correcting people on social media. This study measures such perceptions in the context of the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, introducing the concept of value for correction. We find that value for correction on social media is relatively strong and widespread, with no differences by partisanship or gender. Neither those who engage in correction themselves nor those witnessing the correction of others have higher value for correction. Witnessing correction, on the other hand, is associated with lower concerns about negative consequences of correction, whereas engaging in correction is not.
U2 - 10.51685/jqd.2021.016
DO - 10.51685/jqd.2021.016
M3 - Article
SN - 2673-8813
VL - 1
SP - 1
EP - 22
JO - Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media
JF - Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media
ER -