Value for Correction: Documenting Perceptions about Peer Correction of Misinformation on Social Media in the Context of COVID-19

Leticia Bode, Emily Vraga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Although correction is often suggested as a tool against misinformation, and empirical research suggests it can be an effective one, we know little about how people perceive the act of correcting people on social media. This study measures such perceptions in the context of the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, introducing the concept of value for correction. We find that value for correction on social media is relatively strong and widespread, with no differences by partisanship or gender. Neither those who engage in correction themselves nor those witnessing the correction of others have higher value for correction. Witnessing correction, on the other hand, is associated with lower concerns about negative consequences of correction, whereas engaging in correction is not.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-22
JournalJournal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media
Volume1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Value for Correction: Documenting Perceptions about Peer Correction of Misinformation on Social Media in the Context of COVID-19'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this