Utility of the plain abdominal radiograph for diagnosing ureteral calculi

Craig S. Roth, Brad A. Bowyer, Thomas H. Berquist

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

60 Scopus citations

Abstract

Our study was designed to measure sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, and accuracy of the plain abdominal radiograph (PAR) for diagnosing ureteral calculi (UC) in our emergency department (ED), and to determine if obtaining this test in the ED provides clinically useful diagnostic information. Records of 206 adult patients (147 men, 59 women) who underwent emergency excretory urography as part of an ED evaluation for possible ureteral stones were reviewed. A retrospective scoring index was devised to estimate the clinical probability of a ureteral stone for each patient. All patients had a PAR shortly before the excretory urogram (EXU) was performed. Each PAR was separated from the corresponding EXU, and both were independently reviewed for radiographic evidence of ureterolithiasis. The results of the PAR and EXU interpretations were compared. There were 92 true-positive PARs (45%), 19 false positives (9%), and 39 true negatives (19%), yielding a sensitivity of 62% and a specificity of 67%. In patients with a high estimated clinical probability of a ureteral calculus, the PAR had a positive predictive value of 86% and a negative predictive value of 22%. In the remaining patients, the positive and negative predictive values of the PAR were 69% and 72%, respectively. Each patient's clinical index score was compared to his or her EXU results. For detecting UC, the sensitivity of our scoring index was 82%, and the specificity was 51%; the positive predictive value of the scoring index was 82%, and the negative predictive value was 52%. Based on these data, we conclude the following about the PAR as a diagnostic test in ED patients with suspected UC: 1) sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and negative predictive value are low; 2) it provides no more diagnostic information than an appropriate history, physical examination, and urinalysis; and 3) it should never be used in place of an EXU for proper diagnosis and management of such patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)311-315
Number of pages5
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1985

Keywords

  • radiography, plain films, diagnosis of ureteral calculi
  • ureteral calculi, diagnosis, radiographic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Utility of the plain abdominal radiograph for diagnosing ureteral calculi'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this