Using Scammers’ Data to Estimate the Impact and Importance of Preventing Repeat Mail Fraud Victimization

Lynn Langton, Marguerite DeLiema, Daniel Brannock, Edward Preble

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study examines the frequency and cost of repeat mail fraud victimization in the United States using longitudinal data from a unique source: records from four scam enterprises that operated over a nearly 20-year period. Findings show that most mail fraud victims experience repeat victimization and a small percentage account for most of the losses. Sixty-two per cent of victims responded to more than one mail solicitation. Chronic victims, who responded more than 20 times, comprised 8.8 per cent of the sample and lost $1,771, on average. Findings suggest the need for early intervention to prevent repeat and chronic victimization, thereby reducing the harm for victims. Limitations and implications for future research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)163-181
Number of pages19
JournalBritish Journal of Criminology
Volume65
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies (ISTD). All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • administrative records
  • chronic victimization
  • fraud
  • repeat victimization
  • scammers

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using Scammers’ Data to Estimate the Impact and Importance of Preventing Repeat Mail Fraud Victimization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this