Using ripple effect mapping to evaluate program impact

Choosing or combining the methods that work best for you

Mary Emery, Lorie Higgins, Scott Chazdon, Debra Hansen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    A mind mapping approach to evaluation called Ripple Effects Mapping (REM) has been developed and used by a number of Extension faculty across the country recently. This article describes three approaches to REM, as well as key differences and similarities. The authors, each from different landgrant institutions, believe REM is an effective way to document direct and indirect impacts of community development programs while providing an opportunity for reflection and inspiration to program participants.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Article number2TOT1
    JournalJournal of Extension
    Volume53
    Issue number2
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

    Fingerprint

    community development
    evaluation

    Cite this

    Using ripple effect mapping to evaluate program impact : Choosing or combining the methods that work best for you. / Emery, Mary; Higgins, Lorie; Chazdon, Scott; Hansen, Debra.

    In: Journal of Extension, Vol. 53, No. 2, 2TOT1, 01.01.2015.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{0ade781814814421b66b6c7ae784acac,
    title = "Using ripple effect mapping to evaluate program impact: Choosing or combining the methods that work best for you",
    abstract = "A mind mapping approach to evaluation called Ripple Effects Mapping (REM) has been developed and used by a number of Extension faculty across the country recently. This article describes three approaches to REM, as well as key differences and similarities. The authors, each from different landgrant institutions, believe REM is an effective way to document direct and indirect impacts of community development programs while providing an opportunity for reflection and inspiration to program participants.",
    author = "Mary Emery and Lorie Higgins and Scott Chazdon and Debra Hansen",
    year = "2015",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "53",
    journal = "Journal of Extension",
    issn = "1077-5315",
    publisher = "Extension Journal, Inc.",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Using ripple effect mapping to evaluate program impact

    T2 - Choosing or combining the methods that work best for you

    AU - Emery, Mary

    AU - Higgins, Lorie

    AU - Chazdon, Scott

    AU - Hansen, Debra

    PY - 2015/1/1

    Y1 - 2015/1/1

    N2 - A mind mapping approach to evaluation called Ripple Effects Mapping (REM) has been developed and used by a number of Extension faculty across the country recently. This article describes three approaches to REM, as well as key differences and similarities. The authors, each from different landgrant institutions, believe REM is an effective way to document direct and indirect impacts of community development programs while providing an opportunity for reflection and inspiration to program participants.

    AB - A mind mapping approach to evaluation called Ripple Effects Mapping (REM) has been developed and used by a number of Extension faculty across the country recently. This article describes three approaches to REM, as well as key differences and similarities. The authors, each from different landgrant institutions, believe REM is an effective way to document direct and indirect impacts of community development programs while providing an opportunity for reflection and inspiration to program participants.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929336884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929336884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    VL - 53

    JO - Journal of Extension

    JF - Journal of Extension

    SN - 1077-5315

    IS - 2

    M1 - 2TOT1

    ER -