Using Obesity Research to Shape Obesity Policy in Minnesota: Stakeholder Insights and Feasibility of Recommendations

Judy Jou, Marilyn S. Nanney, Elizabeth Walker, Rachel Callanan, Susan Weisman, Sarah E. Gollust

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Preventing childhood obesity requires innovative, evidence-based policy approaches. This study examines the use of research evidence by obesity policy stakeholders in Minnesota and develops pilot tools for communicating timely evidence to policymakers. Design, Setting, and Participants: From November 2012 to January 2013, semistructured interviews were conducted with 51 Minnesota stakeholders in childhood obesity prevention. Interviewees included 16 state legislators and staff; 16 personnel from the Minnesota Department of Education, Minnesota Department of Health, and Minnesota Department of Transportation; and 19 advocates for and against childhood obesity prevention legislation (response rate = 71%). Main Outcome Measures: Participants were asked their views on 3 themes: (1) Whether and how they used research evidence in their current decision-making processes; (2) barriers to using research evidence for policymaking; and (3) suggestions for improving the evidence translation process. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. A team approach to qualitative analysis was used to summarize themes, compare findings across interviewees' professional roles, and highlight unexpected findings, areas of tension, or illuminating quotes. Results: Stakeholders used research evidence to support policy decisions, educate the public, and overcome value-based arguments. Common challenges included the amount and complexity of research produced and limited relationships between researchers and decision makers. Responding to interviewee recommendations, we developed and assessed 2 pilot tools: A directory of research experts and a series of research webinars on topics related to childhood obesity. Stakeholders found these materials relevant and high-quality but expressed uncertainty about using them in making policy decisions. Conclusions: Stakeholders believe that research evidence should inform the design of programs and policies for childhood obesity prevention; however, many lack the time and resources to consult research consistently. Future efforts to facilitate evidence-informed policymaking should emphasize approaches to designing and presenting research that better meets the needs of policy and programmatic decision makers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)195-203
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Public Health Management and Practice
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Obesity
Pediatric Obesity
Research
Decision Making
Interviews
Directories
Professional Role
Policy Making
Legislation
Uncertainty
Research Personnel
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Education
Health

Keywords

  • child health
  • obesity
  • prevention
  • public health policy
  • qualitative research

Cite this

Using Obesity Research to Shape Obesity Policy in Minnesota : Stakeholder Insights and Feasibility of Recommendations. / Jou, Judy; Nanney, Marilyn S.; Walker, Elizabeth; Callanan, Rachel; Weisman, Susan; Gollust, Sarah E.

In: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, Vol. 24, No. 3, 01.01.2018, p. 195-203.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jou, Judy ; Nanney, Marilyn S. ; Walker, Elizabeth ; Callanan, Rachel ; Weisman, Susan ; Gollust, Sarah E. / Using Obesity Research to Shape Obesity Policy in Minnesota : Stakeholder Insights and Feasibility of Recommendations. In: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2018 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 195-203.
@article{7f9fa4fa949c419db0910f647bf50848,
title = "Using Obesity Research to Shape Obesity Policy in Minnesota: Stakeholder Insights and Feasibility of Recommendations",
abstract = "Objective: Preventing childhood obesity requires innovative, evidence-based policy approaches. This study examines the use of research evidence by obesity policy stakeholders in Minnesota and develops pilot tools for communicating timely evidence to policymakers. Design, Setting, and Participants: From November 2012 to January 2013, semistructured interviews were conducted with 51 Minnesota stakeholders in childhood obesity prevention. Interviewees included 16 state legislators and staff; 16 personnel from the Minnesota Department of Education, Minnesota Department of Health, and Minnesota Department of Transportation; and 19 advocates for and against childhood obesity prevention legislation (response rate = 71{\%}). Main Outcome Measures: Participants were asked their views on 3 themes: (1) Whether and how they used research evidence in their current decision-making processes; (2) barriers to using research evidence for policymaking; and (3) suggestions for improving the evidence translation process. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. A team approach to qualitative analysis was used to summarize themes, compare findings across interviewees' professional roles, and highlight unexpected findings, areas of tension, or illuminating quotes. Results: Stakeholders used research evidence to support policy decisions, educate the public, and overcome value-based arguments. Common challenges included the amount and complexity of research produced and limited relationships between researchers and decision makers. Responding to interviewee recommendations, we developed and assessed 2 pilot tools: A directory of research experts and a series of research webinars on topics related to childhood obesity. Stakeholders found these materials relevant and high-quality but expressed uncertainty about using them in making policy decisions. Conclusions: Stakeholders believe that research evidence should inform the design of programs and policies for childhood obesity prevention; however, many lack the time and resources to consult research consistently. Future efforts to facilitate evidence-informed policymaking should emphasize approaches to designing and presenting research that better meets the needs of policy and programmatic decision makers.",
keywords = "child health, obesity, prevention, public health policy, qualitative research",
author = "Judy Jou and Nanney, {Marilyn S.} and Elizabeth Walker and Rachel Callanan and Susan Weisman and Gollust, {Sarah E.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PHH.0000000000000637",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "195--203",
journal = "Journal of Public Health Management and Practice",
issn = "1078-4659",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using Obesity Research to Shape Obesity Policy in Minnesota

T2 - Stakeholder Insights and Feasibility of Recommendations

AU - Jou, Judy

AU - Nanney, Marilyn S.

AU - Walker, Elizabeth

AU - Callanan, Rachel

AU - Weisman, Susan

AU - Gollust, Sarah E.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objective: Preventing childhood obesity requires innovative, evidence-based policy approaches. This study examines the use of research evidence by obesity policy stakeholders in Minnesota and develops pilot tools for communicating timely evidence to policymakers. Design, Setting, and Participants: From November 2012 to January 2013, semistructured interviews were conducted with 51 Minnesota stakeholders in childhood obesity prevention. Interviewees included 16 state legislators and staff; 16 personnel from the Minnesota Department of Education, Minnesota Department of Health, and Minnesota Department of Transportation; and 19 advocates for and against childhood obesity prevention legislation (response rate = 71%). Main Outcome Measures: Participants were asked their views on 3 themes: (1) Whether and how they used research evidence in their current decision-making processes; (2) barriers to using research evidence for policymaking; and (3) suggestions for improving the evidence translation process. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. A team approach to qualitative analysis was used to summarize themes, compare findings across interviewees' professional roles, and highlight unexpected findings, areas of tension, or illuminating quotes. Results: Stakeholders used research evidence to support policy decisions, educate the public, and overcome value-based arguments. Common challenges included the amount and complexity of research produced and limited relationships between researchers and decision makers. Responding to interviewee recommendations, we developed and assessed 2 pilot tools: A directory of research experts and a series of research webinars on topics related to childhood obesity. Stakeholders found these materials relevant and high-quality but expressed uncertainty about using them in making policy decisions. Conclusions: Stakeholders believe that research evidence should inform the design of programs and policies for childhood obesity prevention; however, many lack the time and resources to consult research consistently. Future efforts to facilitate evidence-informed policymaking should emphasize approaches to designing and presenting research that better meets the needs of policy and programmatic decision makers.

AB - Objective: Preventing childhood obesity requires innovative, evidence-based policy approaches. This study examines the use of research evidence by obesity policy stakeholders in Minnesota and develops pilot tools for communicating timely evidence to policymakers. Design, Setting, and Participants: From November 2012 to January 2013, semistructured interviews were conducted with 51 Minnesota stakeholders in childhood obesity prevention. Interviewees included 16 state legislators and staff; 16 personnel from the Minnesota Department of Education, Minnesota Department of Health, and Minnesota Department of Transportation; and 19 advocates for and against childhood obesity prevention legislation (response rate = 71%). Main Outcome Measures: Participants were asked their views on 3 themes: (1) Whether and how they used research evidence in their current decision-making processes; (2) barriers to using research evidence for policymaking; and (3) suggestions for improving the evidence translation process. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. A team approach to qualitative analysis was used to summarize themes, compare findings across interviewees' professional roles, and highlight unexpected findings, areas of tension, or illuminating quotes. Results: Stakeholders used research evidence to support policy decisions, educate the public, and overcome value-based arguments. Common challenges included the amount and complexity of research produced and limited relationships between researchers and decision makers. Responding to interviewee recommendations, we developed and assessed 2 pilot tools: A directory of research experts and a series of research webinars on topics related to childhood obesity. Stakeholders found these materials relevant and high-quality but expressed uncertainty about using them in making policy decisions. Conclusions: Stakeholders believe that research evidence should inform the design of programs and policies for childhood obesity prevention; however, many lack the time and resources to consult research consistently. Future efforts to facilitate evidence-informed policymaking should emphasize approaches to designing and presenting research that better meets the needs of policy and programmatic decision makers.

KW - child health

KW - obesity

KW - prevention

KW - public health policy

KW - qualitative research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045582900&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045582900&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000637

DO - 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000637

M3 - Article

C2 - 28832436

AN - SCOPUS:85045582900

VL - 24

SP - 195

EP - 203

JO - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

JF - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

SN - 1078-4659

IS - 3

ER -