Using Cooperative Learning to Teach Chemistry

A Meta-analytic Review

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A meta-analysis of recent quantitative studies that examine the effects of cooperative learning (CL) on achievement outcomes in chemistry is presented. Findings from 25 chemical education studies involving 3985 participants (Ntreatment = 1845; Ncontrol = 2140) and published since 2001 show positive association between chemistry achievement and CL use (mean effect size = 0.68, Z = 5.04, p < 0.0001). Practically, an effect size of 0.68 suggests median student performance in a CL group would be at the 75th percentile when compared to that of a student in a traditional group performing at the 50th percentile. However, heterogeneity analysis indicated significant variability among the estimated effect sizes (Q = 248.51, df = 24, p < 0.0001), indicating other factors moderate the effects of CL. Analysis of class size, geographical location, and grade level as possible moderators suggested geographical location accounts for 27% of estimated 40% total heterogeneity (τ2 = 0.40, se = 0.13) and had significant influence (p = 0.003) on effect size estimates. For example, when only US-based studies are considered, the effect size decreases to 0.38, still an improvement of about 15 percentile points but nevertheless much smaller than the omnibus effect size. The findings of these analyses as well the study's implications are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)248-255
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Chemical Education
Volume93
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 9 2016

Fingerprint

cooperative learning
chemistry
Students
Moderators
Education
Association reactions
moderator
Group
student
school grade

Keywords

  • Chemical Education Research
  • Collaborative/Cooperative Learning
  • First-Year Undergraduate/General
  • General Public
  • Second-Year-Undergraduate

Cite this

Using Cooperative Learning to Teach Chemistry : A Meta-analytic Review. / Warfa, Abdi Rizak M.

In: Journal of Chemical Education, Vol. 93, No. 2, 09.02.2016, p. 248-255.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ae7ca308778446d6a39269c53abb0697,
title = "Using Cooperative Learning to Teach Chemistry: A Meta-analytic Review",
abstract = "A meta-analysis of recent quantitative studies that examine the effects of cooperative learning (CL) on achievement outcomes in chemistry is presented. Findings from 25 chemical education studies involving 3985 participants (Ntreatment = 1845; Ncontrol = 2140) and published since 2001 show positive association between chemistry achievement and CL use (mean effect size = 0.68, Z = 5.04, p < 0.0001). Practically, an effect size of 0.68 suggests median student performance in a CL group would be at the 75th percentile when compared to that of a student in a traditional group performing at the 50th percentile. However, heterogeneity analysis indicated significant variability among the estimated effect sizes (Q = 248.51, df = 24, p < 0.0001), indicating other factors moderate the effects of CL. Analysis of class size, geographical location, and grade level as possible moderators suggested geographical location accounts for 27{\%} of estimated 40{\%} total heterogeneity (τ2 = 0.40, se = 0.13) and had significant influence (p = 0.003) on effect size estimates. For example, when only US-based studies are considered, the effect size decreases to 0.38, still an improvement of about 15 percentile points but nevertheless much smaller than the omnibus effect size. The findings of these analyses as well the study's implications are discussed.",
keywords = "Chemical Education Research, Collaborative/Cooperative Learning, First-Year Undergraduate/General, General Public, Second-Year-Undergraduate",
author = "Warfa, {Abdi Rizak M}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00608",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "93",
pages = "248--255",
journal = "Journal of Chemical Education",
issn = "0021-9584",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using Cooperative Learning to Teach Chemistry

T2 - A Meta-analytic Review

AU - Warfa, Abdi Rizak M

PY - 2016/2/9

Y1 - 2016/2/9

N2 - A meta-analysis of recent quantitative studies that examine the effects of cooperative learning (CL) on achievement outcomes in chemistry is presented. Findings from 25 chemical education studies involving 3985 participants (Ntreatment = 1845; Ncontrol = 2140) and published since 2001 show positive association between chemistry achievement and CL use (mean effect size = 0.68, Z = 5.04, p < 0.0001). Practically, an effect size of 0.68 suggests median student performance in a CL group would be at the 75th percentile when compared to that of a student in a traditional group performing at the 50th percentile. However, heterogeneity analysis indicated significant variability among the estimated effect sizes (Q = 248.51, df = 24, p < 0.0001), indicating other factors moderate the effects of CL. Analysis of class size, geographical location, and grade level as possible moderators suggested geographical location accounts for 27% of estimated 40% total heterogeneity (τ2 = 0.40, se = 0.13) and had significant influence (p = 0.003) on effect size estimates. For example, when only US-based studies are considered, the effect size decreases to 0.38, still an improvement of about 15 percentile points but nevertheless much smaller than the omnibus effect size. The findings of these analyses as well the study's implications are discussed.

AB - A meta-analysis of recent quantitative studies that examine the effects of cooperative learning (CL) on achievement outcomes in chemistry is presented. Findings from 25 chemical education studies involving 3985 participants (Ntreatment = 1845; Ncontrol = 2140) and published since 2001 show positive association between chemistry achievement and CL use (mean effect size = 0.68, Z = 5.04, p < 0.0001). Practically, an effect size of 0.68 suggests median student performance in a CL group would be at the 75th percentile when compared to that of a student in a traditional group performing at the 50th percentile. However, heterogeneity analysis indicated significant variability among the estimated effect sizes (Q = 248.51, df = 24, p < 0.0001), indicating other factors moderate the effects of CL. Analysis of class size, geographical location, and grade level as possible moderators suggested geographical location accounts for 27% of estimated 40% total heterogeneity (τ2 = 0.40, se = 0.13) and had significant influence (p = 0.003) on effect size estimates. For example, when only US-based studies are considered, the effect size decreases to 0.38, still an improvement of about 15 percentile points but nevertheless much smaller than the omnibus effect size. The findings of these analyses as well the study's implications are discussed.

KW - Chemical Education Research

KW - Collaborative/Cooperative Learning

KW - First-Year Undergraduate/General

KW - General Public

KW - Second-Year-Undergraduate

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957991235&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957991235&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00608

DO - 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00608

M3 - Article

VL - 93

SP - 248

EP - 255

JO - Journal of Chemical Education

JF - Journal of Chemical Education

SN - 0021-9584

IS - 2

ER -