Abstract
Rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and two strains of mice (Mus musculus, one inbred and one outbred) were immunized against porcine zona pellucida (PZP) antigen. Alginate microspheres or cholera toxin B were used alone or in combination when mucosal immunization routes were used. Serum antibody responses and fertility were assessed. Neither rabbit or mouse groups immunized by mucosal routes generated significant antibody responses to PZP as compared to parenteral immunization (ANOVA, P > 0.05). The study shows that porcine zona pellucida is not an effective mucosal antigen in small mammals.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 372-378 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Animal reproduction science |
| Volume | 93 |
| Issue number | 3-4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 2006 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Alginate microsphere
- Mouse
- Mucosal immunity
- PZP
- Porcine zona pellucida
- Rabbit
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Use of mucosal immunization with porcine zona pellucida (PZP) in mice and rabbits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS