Use of a Geographic Information System to create treatment groups for group-randomized community trials

The Minnesota Heart Health Program

Brittany Krzyzanowski, Steven M Manson, Milton Eder, Len Kne, Niki Oldenburg, Kevin A Peterson, Alan T. Hirsch, Russell V Luepker, Sue Duval

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Group-randomized trials of communities often rely on the convenience of pre-existing administrative divisions, such as school district boundaries or census entities, to divide the study area into intervention and control sites. However, these boundaries may include substantial heterogeneity between regions, introducing unmeasured confounding variables. This challenge can be addressed by the creation of exchangeable intervention and control territories that are equally weighted by pertinent socio-demographic characteristics. The present study used territory design software as a novel approach to partitioning study areas for The Minnesota Heart Health Program's "Ask about Aspirin" Initiative. Methods: Twenty-four territories were created to be similar in terms of age, sex, and educational attainment, as factors known to modify aspirin use. To promote ease of intervention administration, the shape and spread of the territories were controlled. Means of the variables used in balancing the territories were assessed as well as other factors that were not used in the balancing process. Results: The analysis demonstrated that demographic characteristics did not differ significantly between the intervention and control territories created by the territory design software. Conclusions: The creation of exchangeable territories diminishes geographically based impact on outcomes following community interventions in group-randomized trials. The method used to identify comparable geographical units may be applied to a wide range of population-based health intervention trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number185
JournalTrials
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 28 2019

Fingerprint

Software Design
Geographic Information Systems
Aspirin
Demography
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
Health
Censuses
Population

Keywords

  • Community intervention methods
  • Geographic information system (GIS)
  • Group-randomized trials
  • Public health interventions

Cite this

Use of a Geographic Information System to create treatment groups for group-randomized community trials : The Minnesota Heart Health Program. / Krzyzanowski, Brittany; Manson, Steven M; Eder, Milton; Kne, Len; Oldenburg, Niki; Peterson, Kevin A; Hirsch, Alan T.; Luepker, Russell V; Duval, Sue.

In: Trials, Vol. 20, No. 1, 185, 28.03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2c2512c9172b41d9b8dd332794f5b8fb,
title = "Use of a Geographic Information System to create treatment groups for group-randomized community trials: The Minnesota Heart Health Program",
abstract = "Background: Group-randomized trials of communities often rely on the convenience of pre-existing administrative divisions, such as school district boundaries or census entities, to divide the study area into intervention and control sites. However, these boundaries may include substantial heterogeneity between regions, introducing unmeasured confounding variables. This challenge can be addressed by the creation of exchangeable intervention and control territories that are equally weighted by pertinent socio-demographic characteristics. The present study used territory design software as a novel approach to partitioning study areas for The Minnesota Heart Health Program's {"}Ask about Aspirin{"} Initiative. Methods: Twenty-four territories were created to be similar in terms of age, sex, and educational attainment, as factors known to modify aspirin use. To promote ease of intervention administration, the shape and spread of the territories were controlled. Means of the variables used in balancing the territories were assessed as well as other factors that were not used in the balancing process. Results: The analysis demonstrated that demographic characteristics did not differ significantly between the intervention and control territories created by the territory design software. Conclusions: The creation of exchangeable territories diminishes geographically based impact on outcomes following community interventions in group-randomized trials. The method used to identify comparable geographical units may be applied to a wide range of population-based health intervention trials.",
keywords = "Community intervention methods, Geographic information system (GIS), Group-randomized trials, Public health interventions",
author = "Brittany Krzyzanowski and Manson, {Steven M} and Milton Eder and Len Kne and Niki Oldenburg and Peterson, {Kevin A} and Hirsch, {Alan T.} and Luepker, {Russell V} and Sue Duval",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1186/s13063-019-3284-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
journal = "Trials",
issn = "1745-6215",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of a Geographic Information System to create treatment groups for group-randomized community trials

T2 - The Minnesota Heart Health Program

AU - Krzyzanowski, Brittany

AU - Manson, Steven M

AU - Eder, Milton

AU - Kne, Len

AU - Oldenburg, Niki

AU - Peterson, Kevin A

AU - Hirsch, Alan T.

AU - Luepker, Russell V

AU - Duval, Sue

PY - 2019/3/28

Y1 - 2019/3/28

N2 - Background: Group-randomized trials of communities often rely on the convenience of pre-existing administrative divisions, such as school district boundaries or census entities, to divide the study area into intervention and control sites. However, these boundaries may include substantial heterogeneity between regions, introducing unmeasured confounding variables. This challenge can be addressed by the creation of exchangeable intervention and control territories that are equally weighted by pertinent socio-demographic characteristics. The present study used territory design software as a novel approach to partitioning study areas for The Minnesota Heart Health Program's "Ask about Aspirin" Initiative. Methods: Twenty-four territories were created to be similar in terms of age, sex, and educational attainment, as factors known to modify aspirin use. To promote ease of intervention administration, the shape and spread of the territories were controlled. Means of the variables used in balancing the territories were assessed as well as other factors that were not used in the balancing process. Results: The analysis demonstrated that demographic characteristics did not differ significantly between the intervention and control territories created by the territory design software. Conclusions: The creation of exchangeable territories diminishes geographically based impact on outcomes following community interventions in group-randomized trials. The method used to identify comparable geographical units may be applied to a wide range of population-based health intervention trials.

AB - Background: Group-randomized trials of communities often rely on the convenience of pre-existing administrative divisions, such as school district boundaries or census entities, to divide the study area into intervention and control sites. However, these boundaries may include substantial heterogeneity between regions, introducing unmeasured confounding variables. This challenge can be addressed by the creation of exchangeable intervention and control territories that are equally weighted by pertinent socio-demographic characteristics. The present study used territory design software as a novel approach to partitioning study areas for The Minnesota Heart Health Program's "Ask about Aspirin" Initiative. Methods: Twenty-four territories were created to be similar in terms of age, sex, and educational attainment, as factors known to modify aspirin use. To promote ease of intervention administration, the shape and spread of the territories were controlled. Means of the variables used in balancing the territories were assessed as well as other factors that were not used in the balancing process. Results: The analysis demonstrated that demographic characteristics did not differ significantly between the intervention and control territories created by the territory design software. Conclusions: The creation of exchangeable territories diminishes geographically based impact on outcomes following community interventions in group-randomized trials. The method used to identify comparable geographical units may be applied to a wide range of population-based health intervention trials.

KW - Community intervention methods

KW - Geographic information system (GIS)

KW - Group-randomized trials

KW - Public health interventions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063776296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063776296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s13063-019-3284-9

DO - 10.1186/s13063-019-3284-9

M3 - Article

VL - 20

JO - Trials

JF - Trials

SN - 1745-6215

IS - 1

M1 - 185

ER -