Abstract
The number needed to treat (NNT) is a useful way for clinicans to describe the benefit or harm of a treatment as well as the costs involved. When interpreting the NNT it is essential to use the NNT in a clinically equivalent and appropriate setting. When evaluating the consequences of a treatment clinicians should make sure that the patients being treated have the same risk profile asthe study patients. Differences in duration of follow-up and baseline risks can cause significant changes in the NNT; therefore, NNT should be evaluated in addition to relative risk differences and baseline risk to reduce any ambivalence in the assessment of a treatment. This review provides insights into the assessment and clinical use of NNT in the practice.
Translated title of the contribution | Use and interpretation of the number needed to treat in urological practice |
---|---|
Original language | German |
Pages (from-to) | 682-685 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Urologe - Ausgabe A |
Volume | 52 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 2013 |
Keywords
- Essential treatment
- Evidence-based medicine
- Therapy benefits
- Therapy consequences
- Therapy costs