TY - JOUR
T1 - Urological cancer care pathways
T2 - Development and use in the context of systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines
AU - MacLennan, Sara Jane
AU - MacLennan, Steven J.
AU - Imamura, Mari
AU - Omar, Muhammad Imran
AU - Vale, Luke
AU - Lam, Thomas
AU - Royle, Pamela
AU - Royle, Justine
AU - Swami, Satchi
AU - Pickard, Rob
AU - McClinton, Sam
AU - Griffiths, T. R Leyshon
AU - Dahm, Philipp
AU - N'Dow, James
PY - 2011/6
Y1 - 2011/6
N2 - Background: Making healthcare treatment decisions is a complex process involving a broad stakeholder base including patients, their families, health professionals, clinical practice guideline developers and funders of healthcare. Methods: This paper presents a review of a methodology for the development of urological cancer care pathways (UCAN care pathways), which reflects an appreciation of this broad stakeholder base. The methods section includes an overview of the steps in the development of the UCAN care pathways and engagement with clinical content experts and patient groups. Results: The development process is outlined, the uses of the urological cancer care pathways discussed and the implications for clinical practice highlighted. The full set of UCAN care pathways is published in this paper. These include care pathways on localised prostate cancer, locally advanced prostate cancer, metastatic prostate cancer, hormone-resistant prostate cancer, localised renal cell cancer, advanced renal cell cancer, testicular cancer, penile cancer, muscle invasive and metastatic bladder cancer and non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Conclusion: The process provides a useful framework for improving urological cancer care through evidence synthesis, research prioritisation, stakeholder involvement and international collaboration. Although the focus of this work is urological cancers, the methodology can be applied to all aspects of urology and is transferable to other clinical specialties.
AB - Background: Making healthcare treatment decisions is a complex process involving a broad stakeholder base including patients, their families, health professionals, clinical practice guideline developers and funders of healthcare. Methods: This paper presents a review of a methodology for the development of urological cancer care pathways (UCAN care pathways), which reflects an appreciation of this broad stakeholder base. The methods section includes an overview of the steps in the development of the UCAN care pathways and engagement with clinical content experts and patient groups. Results: The development process is outlined, the uses of the urological cancer care pathways discussed and the implications for clinical practice highlighted. The full set of UCAN care pathways is published in this paper. These include care pathways on localised prostate cancer, locally advanced prostate cancer, metastatic prostate cancer, hormone-resistant prostate cancer, localised renal cell cancer, advanced renal cell cancer, testicular cancer, penile cancer, muscle invasive and metastatic bladder cancer and non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Conclusion: The process provides a useful framework for improving urological cancer care through evidence synthesis, research prioritisation, stakeholder involvement and international collaboration. Although the focus of this work is urological cancers, the methodology can be applied to all aspects of urology and is transferable to other clinical specialties.
KW - Care pathways
KW - Clinical practice guidelines
KW - Systematic review
KW - Urological cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957493996&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957493996&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00345-011-0660-9
DO - 10.1007/s00345-011-0660-9
M3 - Review article
C2 - 21350870
AN - SCOPUS:79957493996
SN - 0724-4983
VL - 29
SP - 291
EP - 301
JO - World Journal of Urology
JF - World Journal of Urology
IS - 3
ER -