TY - JOUR
T1 - Uptake of BRCA1 rearrangement panel testing
T2 - In individuals previously tested for BRCA1/2 mutations
AU - Shannon, Kristen Mahoney
AU - Muzikansky, Alona
AU - Chan-Smutko, Gayun
AU - Niendorf, Kristen Baker
AU - Ryan, Paula D.
PY - 2006/12
Y1 - 2006/12
N2 - PURPOSE: Individuals undergoing genetic testing for BRCA1/2 mutations are routinely counseled about the sensitivity and specificity of testing. In August 2002, testing for 5 large genomic rearrangements in the BRCA1 gene that would not have been detected with full gene sequence analysis became commercially available. We present our data on uptake of the BRCA1 rearrangement panel testing in our clinical cancer genetics program. METHODS: Women who participated in our clinical genetic testing program and had previously received an uninformative negative or variant of uncertain significance result from BRCA1/2 full gene sequencing were invited to consider BRCA1 rearrangement panel testing. RESULTS: Overall, 18/72 individuals underwent BRCA1 rearrangement panel testing. No significant differences were found in the levels of BRCAPRO scores (P = 0.406), age at testing (P = 0.986), number of children (P = 0.35) or number of siblings (P = 0.4) between individuals who chose to pursue additional testing with the rearrangement panel and those who declined. Fisher's Exact Test analysis showed that there is a negative association between having breast or ovarian cancer and being inclined to undergo rearrangement panel testing (P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Individuals who undergo genetic testing will not consistently pursue additional or enhanced genetic testing. Future research is needed to clearly elucidate the factors associated with uptake of additional genetic testing.
AB - PURPOSE: Individuals undergoing genetic testing for BRCA1/2 mutations are routinely counseled about the sensitivity and specificity of testing. In August 2002, testing for 5 large genomic rearrangements in the BRCA1 gene that would not have been detected with full gene sequence analysis became commercially available. We present our data on uptake of the BRCA1 rearrangement panel testing in our clinical cancer genetics program. METHODS: Women who participated in our clinical genetic testing program and had previously received an uninformative negative or variant of uncertain significance result from BRCA1/2 full gene sequencing were invited to consider BRCA1 rearrangement panel testing. RESULTS: Overall, 18/72 individuals underwent BRCA1 rearrangement panel testing. No significant differences were found in the levels of BRCAPRO scores (P = 0.406), age at testing (P = 0.986), number of children (P = 0.35) or number of siblings (P = 0.4) between individuals who chose to pursue additional testing with the rearrangement panel and those who declined. Fisher's Exact Test analysis showed that there is a negative association between having breast or ovarian cancer and being inclined to undergo rearrangement panel testing (P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Individuals who undergo genetic testing will not consistently pursue additional or enhanced genetic testing. Future research is needed to clearly elucidate the factors associated with uptake of additional genetic testing.
KW - BRCA1 rearrangement panel
KW - BRCA1/2 testing
KW - Decliners of genetic testing
KW - Genetic testing uptake
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845744371&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845744371&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/01.gim.0000250202.06200.6d
DO - 10.1097/01.gim.0000250202.06200.6d
M3 - Article
C2 - 17172936
AN - SCOPUS:33845744371
SN - 1098-3600
VL - 8
SP - 740
EP - 745
JO - Genetics in Medicine
JF - Genetics in Medicine
IS - 12
ER -